Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34781929›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Integrating diabetes, hypertension and HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa: a Delphi consensus study on international best practice.

Geoff McCombe, Sara Murtagh, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Marie Claire Van Hout, Max Bachmann, Shabbar Jaffar, Anupam Garrib, Kaushik Ramaiya, Nelson K Sewankambo, Sayoki Mfinanga and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Geoff McCombeUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. geoff.mccombe@ucd.ie.
Sara MurtaghUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jeffrey V LazarusBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marie Claire Van HoutLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Max BachmannUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Shabbar JaffarLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Anupam GarribLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Kaushik RamaiyaShree Hindu Mandal Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Nelson K SewankamboMakerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sayoki MfinangaNational Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Walter CullenUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IELiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBAga Khan Hospital Dar es Salaam · TZBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESLiverpool John Moores University · GBMakerere University · UGNational Institute for Medical Research · TZUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough HIV continues to have a high prevalence among adults in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) such as diabetes and hypertension is increasing rapidly. There is an urgent need to expand the capacity of healthcare systems in SSA to provide NCD services and scale up existing chronic care management pathways. The aim of this study was to identify key components, outcomes, and best practice in integrated service provision for the prevention, identification and treatment of HIV, hypertension and diabetes.

methodsAn international, multi stakeholder e-Delphi consensus study was conducted over two successive rounds. In Round 1, 24 participants were asked to score 27 statements, under the headings 'Service Provision' and 'Benefits of Integration', by importance. In Round 2, the 16 participants who completed Round 1 were shown the distribution of scores from other participants along with the score that they attributed to an outcome and were asked to reflect on the score they gave, based on the scores of the other participants and then to rescore if they wished to. Nine participants completed Round 2.

resultsBased on the Round 1 ranking, 19 of the 27 outcomes met the 70% threshold for consensus. Four additional outcomes suggested by participants in Round 1 were added to Round 2, and upon review by participants, 22 of the 31 outcomes met the consensus threshold. The five items participants scored from 7 to 9 in both rounds as essential for effective integrated healthcare delivery of health services for chronic conditions were improved data collection and surveillance of NCDs among people living with HIV to inform integrated NCD/HIV programme management, strengthened drug procurement systems, availability of equipment and access to relevant blood tests, health education for all chronic conditions, and enhanced continuity of care for patients with multimorbidity.

conclusionsThis study highlights the outcomes which may form key components of future complex interventions to define a model of integrated healthcare delivery for diabetes, hypertension and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiabetes MellitusHIV InfectionsHypertensionAdultAfrica South of the SaharaDelphi TechniqueHumansPrevalenceHealthcare utilizationHIVIntegrationNoncommunicable diseasesService deliverySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID34781929
PMCPMC8591882
OpenAlexW3212559792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.