Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34781913›Full record

Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2021

Quantitative analysis and clinical application of iris circulation in ischemic retinal disease.

Yanwen Jia, Wenwen Xue, Xiaowei Tong, Yulan Wang, Lipu Cui, Haidong Zou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03631108 (Feasibility Study and Preliminary Application Study on Noninvasive Iris Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03631108 unknown statusnot on this map

Feasibility Study and Preliminary Application Study on Noninvasive Iris Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA)

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterRan2018 to 2019Enrolled4,000ConditionsConjunctivitis, Glaucoma, Myopia, Diabetic RetinopathyArmsOCTA (ZEISS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. "ArmedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Current clinical applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography: a review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanwen Jia *Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, 180 Kangding Road, Jing An District, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Wenwen Xue *Shanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center, Shanghai Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaowei TongShanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center, Shanghai Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yulan WangShanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center, Shanghai Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Lipu CuiShanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center, Shanghai Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Haidong ZouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, 180 Kangding Road, Jing An District, Shanghai, 200000, China. zouhaidong@sjtu.edu.cn.
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention & Treatment Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate quantitative changes in iris blood circulation in patients with ischemic risk.

methodsThis observational case-control study included 79 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The RVO group included 21 patients; the monocular proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group included 19 patients; the nondiabetic retinopathy (NDR) group included 18 patients; and the healthy control group included 21 healthy controls. In the RVO group, we analyzed RVO affected eyes, RVO contralateral eyes, and healthy control eyes. We also compared eyes with PDR and contralateral eyes without PDR, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) without DR, and healthy control eyes. The microvascular networks of the iris and retina were analyzed using optical coherence tomography angiography. The analysis included vessel area density (VAD) and vessel skeleton density (VSD) of iris and retina.

resultsIn the RVO group, the VAD and VSD of iris in the affected eye were higher than those in contralateral and healthy control eyes, and the VAD and VSD of contralateral eyes were higher than those of healthy control eyes. The retinal blood flow of the RVO eyes was less than that of the contralateral and healthy control eyes, but there were no difference between the contralateral eyes and healthy control eyes. The VAD and VSD of iris in PDR were larger than nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and the NPDR were larger than NDR. There were no differences between NDR and healthy control eyes. Also, there were no differences among the four groups with respect to retinal blood flow.

conclusionsCompared with the retina, iris blood circulation quantitative analysis data seem to be more sensitive to ischemia and may be used as a new predictor of ischemic disease, even if further research is needed to better understand the clinical value and importance of this analysis.

trial registrationThe trial is registered with the clinical trial registration number nct03631108 .

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyRetinal VesselsCase-Control StudiesFluorescein AngiographyHumansIrisIschemiaDiabetic retinopathyIris vesselIschemic diseaseOptical coherence tomography angiographyRetinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID34781913
PMCPMC8594238
OpenAlexW3185558900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.