ArticlemAbs
Development of a robust and semi-automated two-step antibody purification process.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing asymmetric antibody purification: a semi-automated process and its digital integration.mAbs · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in antibody discovery technologies, especially with the availability of humanized mice and phage/yeast library approaches, enable the generation of a large diversity of antibodies against nearly any target of interest. As a result, there is an increasing demand for the production of larger numbers of purified antibodies at quantities (10s-100s of milligrams) sufficient for functional screening assays, drug-ability/develop-ability studies and immunogenicity assessments. To accommodate this need, new methods are required that bridge miniature high throughput/plate-based purification and conventional, one at a time, two-step purification at much larger scales. Thus, we developed a semi-automated, mid-scale (i.e., 1-75 mg) purification process that uses a combination of parallel affinity capture and automated sequential polishing to provide substantially improved throughput while delivering high purity. We optimized the affinity capture step to perform 24 monoclonal antibody purifications in parallel using a Protein Maker for 20-200 mL culture media. The eluant is transferred directly to an AKTA pure system equipped with an autosampler for sequential preparative size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and undesirable impurities, as well as exchange the antibody into a buffer suitable for most uses, including cell-based assays. This two-step purification procedure, together with plate-based protein analytical methods, can purify 24-48 monoclonal antibodies in <20 hours and generate up to 80 mg per sample. A stringent clean-in-place protocol for both systems and column maintenance was designed and established to minimize endotoxin contamination. This process has proven to be very reliable and robust, enabling the production of thousands of antibodies of sufficient quality and quantity that are suitable for cell-based assays, biochemical/biophysical characterization, and in vivo animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.