Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34781752›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2022

Molecular detection of

Ingo Schäfer, Barbara Kohn, Ard M Nijhof, Elisabeth Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Feline vector-borne pathogens in Iran.Parasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. First report ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Geographical isolation and hyperendemicity ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Vector-Borne Pathogens in Stray Cats in Eastern Germany (Thuringia).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Screening of Domestic Cats from North-Eastern Hungary forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingo SchäferLaboklin, Bad Kissingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9264-6607
Barbara KohnClinic for Small Animals, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ard M NijhofInstitute of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Elisabeth MüllerLaboklin, Bad Kissingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThree species of protozoal

methodsThe study included cats tested for

resultsSixty-four of 931 cats (7%) tested positive for CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although infections with

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesCoccidiosisEucoccidiidaFelisAnimalsCatsGermanyRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 18ShepatozoonosisPCRtick-borne infectionVector-borne infection

Identifiers

PMID34781752
PMCPMC10812316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.