Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34781640›Full record

ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2022

Long-term risk of all-cause mortality in live kidney donors: a matched cohort study.

Eunjeong Kang, Sehoon Park, Jina Park, Yaerim Kim, Minsu Park, Kwangsoo Kim, Hyo Jeong Kim, Miyeun Han, Jang-Hee Cho, Jung Pyo Lee and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Eunjeong KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sehoon ParkDepartment of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jina ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yaerim KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Minsu ParkDepartment of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Kwangsoo KimTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine & Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo Jeong KimDivision of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Miyeun HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jang-Hee ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jung Pyo LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sik LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Soo Wan KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Sang Min ParkDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Wan ChaeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Ho Jun ChinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Yong Chul KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yon Su KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insun ChoiDivision of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hajeong LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Evidence Collaborating Agency NECA-A-20-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term outcomes of live kidney donors remain controversial, although this information is crucial for selecting potential donors. Thus, this study compared the long-term risk of all-cause mortality between live kidney donors and healthy control.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study including donors from seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Persons who underwent voluntary health screening were included as controls. We created a matched control group considering age, sex, era, body mass index, baseline hypertension, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and dipstick albuminuria. The study outcome was progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and all-cause mortality as identified in the linked claims database.

resultsWe screened 1,878 kidney donors and 78,115 health screening examinees from 2003 to 2016. After matching, 1,701 persons remained in each group. The median age of the matched study subjects was 44 years, and 46.6% were male. Among the study subjects, 2.7% and 16.6% had underlying diabetes and hypertension, respectively. There were no ESKD events in the matched donor and control groups. There were 24 (1.4%) and 12 mortality cases (0.7%) in the matched donor and control groups, respectively. In the age-sex adjusted model, the risk for all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the donor group than in the control group. However, the significance was not retained after socioeconomic status was included as a covariate (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-3.80).

conclusionAll-cause mortality was similar in live kidney donors and matched non-donor healthy controls with similar health status and socioeconomic status in the Korean population.

Indexed as

End-stage kidney diseaseLiving donorsMortalityPrognosisRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34781640
PMCPMC8816409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.