ArticlePhysical review. E2021
Principles of slowed hydrogen diffusion through a mucus layer.
Article in Physical review. E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The control of transport through mucus layers is a ubiquitous phenomenon in physiological systems. Mucus is often tasked with the mediation of passive, diffusive transport of small ionic species. However, questions remain regarding how mucin gel characteristics (charge density of the polymeric network, binding affinity of ions with mucus) govern the rate at which ions diffuse through mucus layers. Experimental studies measuring hydrogen diffusion through gastric mucus have provided conflicting results, and it is not clear if the rate of ionic diffusion through mucus layers is appreciably different than in aqueous environments (depending on experimental preparation). Here, we present a mathematical analysis of electrodiffussion of two ionic species (hydrogen and chloride) through a mucus layer. In addition to accounting for the chemical binding of hydrogen to the mucus network, we enforce a zero net current condition (as mucus layers in physiological systems are not generally electrogenic) and calculate the Donnan potential that occurs at the edge of the mucus layer. The model predicts the steady-state fluxes of ionic species and the induced potential across the layer. We characterize the dependence of these quantities on the chemical properties of the mucus gel, the composition of the bath solution, and the molecular mobility of the dissolved anion, and we show that the model predictions are consistent with a large portion of the experimental literature. Our analysis predicts that mucus layers generically slow the diffusive transport of hydrogen, but that chemical binding with the network attenuates this effect.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.