SynthesisCardiology
Identification and Mapping Real-World Data Sources for Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndrome, and Atrial Fibrillation.
Synthesis in Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Advances in Non-Invasive Detection Technologies for Heart Failure: Synergistic Application of Multimodal Sensing and Intelligent Algorithms.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning-enabled systematic review on coded healthcare data in heart failure research.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Failure: From Biomarkers to Personalized Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Applications of ChatGPT in Heart Failure Prevention, Diagnosis, Management, and Research: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence to enhance clinical value across the spectrum of cardiovascular healthcare.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Wearables and Remote Monitoring for Heart Failure: Current and Future Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- CODE-EHR best practice framework for the use of structured electronic healthcare records in clinical research.European heart journal · 2022Article
- Systematic approach to outcome assessment from coded electronic healthcare records in the DaRe2THINK NHS-embedded randomized trialEuropean heart journal. Digital health · 2022Article
- CODE-EHR best practice framework for the use of structured electronic healthcare records in clinical research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransparent and robust real-world evidence sources are increasingly important for global health, including cardiovascular (CV) diseases. We aimed to identify global real-world data (RWD) sources for heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and atrial fibrillation (AF).
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of publications with RWD pertaining to HF, ACS, and AF (2010-2018), generating a list of unique data sources. Metadata were extracted based on the source type (e.g., electronic health records, genomics, and clinical data), study design, population size, clinical characteristics, follow-up duration, outcomes, and assessment of data availability for future studies and linkage.
resultsOverall, 11,889 publications were retrieved for HF, 10,729 for ACS, and 6,262 for AF. From these, 322 (HF), 287 (ACS), and 220 (AF) data sources were selected for detailed review. The majority of data sources had near complete data on demographic variables (HF: 94%, ACS: 99%, and AF: 100%) and considerable data on comorbidities (HF: 77%, ACS: 93%, and AF: 97%). The least reported data categories were drug codes (HF, ACS, and AF: 10%) and caregiver involvement (HF: 6%, ACS: 1%, and AF: 1%). Only a minority of data sources provided information on access to data for other researchers (11%) or whether data could be linked to other data sources to maximize clinical impact (20%). The list and metadata for the RWD sources are publicly available at www.escardio.org/bigdata.
conclusionsThis review has created a comprehensive resource of CV data sources, providing new avenues to improve future real-world research and to achieve better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.