Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34780664›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2022

Discussion on "distributional independent component analysis for diverse neuroimaging modalities" by Ben Wu, Subhadip Pal, Jian Kang, and Ying Guo.

Kan Keeratimahat, Thomas E Nichols

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kan KeeratimahatDepartment of Computer Science, Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5110-2547
Thomas E NicholsBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-5103

Funding

Spatial inference methods for image analysisR01EB026859 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHWARTZMAN, ARMIN · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
Scalable Bayesian methods for big imaging data analysisR01DA048993 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY D, KANG, JIAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026859NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wu et al. have made an important contribution to the methodology for data-driven analysis of MRI data. However, we wish to challenge the authors on new potential applications of their approach beyond diffusion tensor imaging data, and to think carefully about the impact of random initialization implicit in their method. We illustrate the variability found from re-analyzing the supplied demonstration data multiple times, finding that the discovered independent components have a wide range of reliability, from nearly perfect overlap to no overlap at all.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingNeuroimagingBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTimeDTIfMRIindependent component analysismultimodality neuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID34780664
PMCPMC9107521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.