Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34780472›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

daf-16/FOXO blocks adult cell fate in Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larvae via lin-41/TRIM71.

Matthew J Wirick, Allison R Cale, Isaac T Smith, Amelia F Alessi, Margaret R Starostik, Liberta Cuko, Kyal Lalk, Mikayla N Schmidt, Benjamin S Olson, Payton M Salomon and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. microPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuronal IL-17 controlsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Forkhead box O proteins: steering the course of stem cell fate.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. microPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. DistinctmicroPublication biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J WirickBiochemistry, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0557-3783
Allison R CaleDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-247X
Isaac T SmithDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-7250
Amelia F AlessiDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Margaret R StarostikDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-2765
Liberta CukoDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2007-3883
Kyal LalkDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-320X
Mikayla N SchmidtDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.
Benjamin S OlsonDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5440-1315
Payton M SalomonDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0283-4482
Alexis SantosDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.
Axel Schmitter-SánchezDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-0383
Himani GalagaliDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8983-6397
Kevin J RankeDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9916-1204
Payton A WolbertDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1102-1408
Macy L KnoblockDepartment of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-8692
John K KimDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-3254
Xantha KarpBiochemistry, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6602-5583
Central Michigan University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Formation and Function of Glycolytic Bodies in HypoxiaR01GM129301 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, JOHN · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
The role of post-translational modifications in miRISC functionR01GM118875 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, JOHN · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
Stem Cell Multipotency During QuiescenceR15GM117568 · NIGMS · CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI KARP, XANTHA · 2015 to 2015
$351k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118875NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129301NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM117568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many tissue-specific stem cells maintain the ability to produce multiple cell types during long periods of non-division, or quiescence. FOXO transcription factors promote quiescence and stem cell maintenance, but the mechanisms by which FOXO proteins promote multipotency during quiescence are still emerging. The single FOXO ortholog in C. elegans, daf-16, promotes entry into a quiescent and stress-resistant larval stage called dauer in response to adverse environmental cues. During dauer, stem and progenitor cells maintain or re-establish multipotency to allow normal development to resume after dauer. We find that during dauer, daf-16/FOXO prevents epidermal stem cells (seam cells) from prematurely adopting differentiated, adult characteristics. In particular, dauer larvae that lack daf-16 misexpress collagens that are normally adult-enriched. Using col-19p::gfp as an adult cell fate marker, we find that all major daf-16 isoforms contribute to opposing col-19p::gfp expression during dauer. By contrast, daf-16(0) larvae that undergo non-dauer development do not misexpress col-19p::gfp. Adult cell fate and the timing of col-19p::gfp expression are regulated by the heterochronic gene network, including lin-41 and lin-29. lin-41 encodes an RNA-binding protein orthologous to LIN41/TRIM71 in mammals, and lin-29 encodes a conserved zinc finger transcription factor. In non-dauer development, lin-41 opposes adult cell fate by inhibiting the translation of lin-29, which directly activates col-19 transcription and promotes adult cell fate. We find that during dauer, lin-41 blocks col-19p::gfp expression, but surprisingly, lin-29 is not required in this context. Additionally, daf-16 promotes the expression of lin-41 in dauer larvae. The col-19p::gfp misexpression phenotype observed in dauer larvae with reduced daf-16 requires the downregulation of lin-41, but does not require lin-29. Taken together, this work demonstrates a novel role for daf-16/FOXO as a heterochronic gene that promotes expression of lin-41/TRIM71 to contribute to multipotent cell fate in a quiescent stem cell model.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCollagenForkhead Transcription FactorsLarvaTranscription FactorsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCollagendaf-16 protein, C elegansForkhead Transcription FactorsLIN-41 protein, C elegansTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID34780472
PMCPMC8629381
OpenAlexW3213902573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.