Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34780468›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Estimating repeat spectra and genome length from low-coverage genome skims with RESPECT.

Shahab Sarmashghi, Metin Balaban, Eleonora Rachtman, Behrouz Touri, Siavash Mirarab, Vineet Bafna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DipSkmer: Reference-free population genomics with diploid genome skims.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome research · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analyses of Nuclear Reads Obtained Using Genome Skimming.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. K-Mer-Based Genome Size Estimation in Theory and Practice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shahab SarmashghiDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0564-1643
Metin BalabanBioinformatics & Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6947-5915
Eleonora RachtmanBioinformatics & Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-5750
Behrouz TouriDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-7329
Siavash MirarabDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5410-1518
Vineet BafnaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-6241

Funding

Computational methods for detecting patterns of complex genomic variationR01GM114362 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cost of sequencing the genome is dropping at a much faster rate compared to assembling and finishing the genome. The use of lightly sampled genomes (genome-skims) could be transformative for genomic ecology, and results using k-mers have shown the advantage of this approach in identification and phylogenetic placement of eukaryotic species. Here, we revisit the basic question of estimating genomic parameters such as genome length, coverage, and repeat structure, focusing specifically on estimating the k-mer repeat spectrum. We show using a mix of theoretical and empirical analysis that there are fundamental limitations to estimating the k-mer spectra due to ill-conditioned systems, and that has implications for other genomic parameters. We get around this problem using a novel constrained optimization approach (Spline Linear Programming), where the constraints are learned empirically. On reads simulated at 1X coverage from 66 genomes, our method, REPeat SPECTra Estimation (RESPECT), had 2.2% error in length estimation compared to 27% error previously achieved. In shotgun sequenced read samples with contaminants, RESPECT length estimates had median error 4%, in contrast to other methods that had median error 80%. Together, the results suggest that low-pass genomic sequencing can yield reliable estimates of the length and repeat content of the genome. The RESPECT software will be publicly available at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_shahab-2Dsarmashghi_RESPECT.git&d=DwIGAw&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=ZozViWvD1E8PorCkfwYKYQMVKFoEcqLFm4Tg49XnPcA&m=f-xS8GMHKckknkc7Xpp8FJYw_ltUwz5frOw1a5pJ81EpdTOK8xhbYmrN4ZxniM96&s=717o8hLR1JmHFpRPSWG6xdUQTikyUjicjkipjFsKG4w&e=.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGenomicsHumansInvertebratesLeast-Squares AnalysisLinear ModelsMammalsModels, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID34780468
PMCPMC8629397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.