Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34780230›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2021

Functional assessment of restrictive eating: A three-study clinically heterogeneous and transdiagnostic investigation.

Shirley B Wang, Kathryn R Fox, Chelsea Boccagno, Jill M Hooley, Patrick Mair, Matthew K Nock, Ann F Haynos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Contra-Hedonic Functions of Self-Destructive Behaviors in Adolescents.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Identification of Affective- and Social-Reinforcement Functions of Driven Exercise: Evidence From Three Samples.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Does Evidence Support an Emotion Regulation Model of Anorexia Nervosa? A Systematic Review of Over a Decade of Research.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Difficulties with positive emotion regulation in anorexia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shirley B WangDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-3014
Kathryn R FoxDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-2697-7771
Chelsea BoccagnoDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-7077-4066
Jill M HooleyDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-3540
Patrick MairDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-6511
Matthew K NockDepartment of Psychology.
Ann F HaynosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Funding

Neural Correlates of Reward and Symptom Expression in Anorexia NervosaK23MH112867 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2017 to 2021
$878k
Mathematical and computational modeling of suicidal thoughts and behaviorsF31MH125495 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SHIRLEY B · 2021 to 2022
$70k
Hilda and Preston Davis FoundationKlarman Family FoundationNational Science FoundationNIMH NIH HHS F31 MH125495NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restrictive eating is common and associated with negative psychological outcomes across the life span and eating disorder (ED) severity levels. Little is known about functional processes that maintain restriction, especially outside of narrow diagnostic categories (e.g., anorexia nervosa). Here, we extend research on operant four-function models (identifying automatic negative, automatic positive, social negative, and social positive reinforcement functions) that have previously been applied to nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), binge eating, and purging to restricting. We assessed restrictive eating functions in three samples: clinically heterogeneous adolescents (Study 1: N = 457), transdiagnostic adults (Study 2: N = 145), and adults with acute or recently weight-restored anorexia nervosa (Study 3: N = 45). Study 1 indicated the four-function model was a good fit for restricting (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .06, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = .88). This factor structure replicated in Study 2 (comparative fit index [CFI] = .97, RMSEA = .07, TLI = .97, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = .09). Unlike NSSI, binge eating, and purging, which have been found to primarily serve automatic negative reinforcement functions, all three present studies found automatic positive reinforcement was most highly endorsed (by up to 85% of participants). In Studies 1 and 3, automatic functions were associated with poorer emotion regulation (ps < .05). In Study 1, social functions were associated with less social support (ps < .001). Across studies, automatic functions were associated with greater restriction ps < .05). Functions varied slightly by ED diagnosis. Across ED presentation, severity, and developmental stage, restrictive eating may be largely maintained by automatic positive reinforcement, with some variability across presentations. Continued examination of restrictive eating functions will establish processes that maintain restriction, allowing more precise treatment targeting for these problematic behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAdultHumans

Identifiers

PMID34780230
PMCPMC8597895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.