Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34780174›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021

Allosteric Effect of Nanobody Binding on Ligand-Specific Active States of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor.

Yue Chen, Oliver Fleetwood, Sergio Pérez-Conesa, Lucie Delemotte

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Early Events in βThe Journal of membrane biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine learning and protein allostery.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Elucidation of a dynamic interplay between a beta-2 adrenergic receptor, its agonist, and stimulatory G protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Exploring the deactivation mechanism of humanFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue ChenScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-17121 Solna, Sweden.
Oliver FleetwoodScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-17121 Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4277-2661
Sergio Pérez-ConesaScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-17121 Solna, Sweden.
Lucie DelemotteScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-17121 Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-3899
Science for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobody binding stabilizes G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in a fully active state and modulates their affinity for bound ligands. However, the atomic-level basis for this allosteric regulation remains elusive. Here, we investigate the conformational changes induced by the binding of a nanobody (Nb80) on the active-like β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) via enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations. Dimensionality reduction analysis shows that Nb80 stabilizes structural features of the β2AR with an ∼14 Å outward movement of transmembrane helix 6 and a close proximity of transmembrane (TM) helices 5 and 7, and favors the fully active-like conformation of the receptor, independent of ligand binding, in contrast to the conditions under which no intracellular binding partner is bound, in which case the receptor is only stabilized in an intermediate-active state. This activation is supported by the residues located at hotspots located on TMs 5, 6, and 7, as shown by supervised machine learning methods. Besides, ligand-specific subtle differences in the conformations assumed by intracellular loop 2 and extracellular loop 2 are captured from the trajectories of various ligand-bound receptors in the presence of Nb80. Dynamic network analysis further reveals that Nb80 binding triggers tighter and stronger local communication networks between the Nb80 and the ligand-binding sites, primarily involving residues around ICL2 and the intracellular end of TM3, TM5, TM6, as well as ECL2, ECL3, and the extracellular ends of TM6 and TM7. In particular, we identify unique allosteric signal transmission mechanisms between the Nb80-binding site and the extracellular domains in conformations modulated by a full agonist, BI167107, and a G-protein-biased partial agonist, salmeterol, involving mainly TM1 and TM2, and TM5, respectively. Altogether, our results provide insights into the effect of intracellular binding partners on the GPCR activation mechanism, which should be taken into account in structure-based drug discovery.

Indexed as

Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Signal TransductionAllosteric RegulationBinding SitesLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationLigandsReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2

Identifiers

PMID34780174
PMCPMC8715506
OpenAlexW3213797785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.