ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021
Allosteric Effect of Nanobody Binding on Ligand-Specific Active States of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atomic, structural and molecular insights into GPCR ligand binding and signalling.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Targeting tumor-associated G-protein coupled receptors: beyond single-axis inhibition toward multidimensional regulation.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Mapping signal transduction in bistable jumping spider rhodopsin 1.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Investigator-blind discovery of structural elements controlling GPCR function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Molecular dynamics study of differential effects of serotonin-2A-receptor (5-HT2AR) modulators.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- To activate a G protein-coupled receptor permanently with cell surface photodynamic action in the gastrointestinal tract.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Nanobody engineering: computational modelling and design for biomedical and therapeutic applications.FEBS open bio · 2025Review
- Early Events in βThe Journal of membrane biology · 2024Article
- Generation and characterization of nanobodies targeting GPCR.Biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Coevolution-Driven Method for Efficiently Simulating Conformational Changes in Proteins Reveals Molecular Details of Ligand Effects in the β2AR Receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Activation mechanism of the human Smoothened receptor.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Machine learning and protein allostery.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023Review
- Elucidation of a dynamic interplay between a beta-2 adrenergic receptor, its agonist, and stimulatory G protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Exploring the deactivation mechanism of humanFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Intracellular VHHs to monitor and modulate GPCR signaling.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanobody binding stabilizes G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in a fully active state and modulates their affinity for bound ligands. However, the atomic-level basis for this allosteric regulation remains elusive. Here, we investigate the conformational changes induced by the binding of a nanobody (Nb80) on the active-like β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) via enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations. Dimensionality reduction analysis shows that Nb80 stabilizes structural features of the β2AR with an ∼14 Å outward movement of transmembrane helix 6 and a close proximity of transmembrane (TM) helices 5 and 7, and favors the fully active-like conformation of the receptor, independent of ligand binding, in contrast to the conditions under which no intracellular binding partner is bound, in which case the receptor is only stabilized in an intermediate-active state. This activation is supported by the residues located at hotspots located on TMs 5, 6, and 7, as shown by supervised machine learning methods. Besides, ligand-specific subtle differences in the conformations assumed by intracellular loop 2 and extracellular loop 2 are captured from the trajectories of various ligand-bound receptors in the presence of Nb80. Dynamic network analysis further reveals that Nb80 binding triggers tighter and stronger local communication networks between the Nb80 and the ligand-binding sites, primarily involving residues around ICL2 and the intracellular end of TM3, TM5, TM6, as well as ECL2, ECL3, and the extracellular ends of TM6 and TM7. In particular, we identify unique allosteric signal transmission mechanisms between the Nb80-binding site and the extracellular domains in conformations modulated by a full agonist, BI167107, and a G-protein-biased partial agonist, salmeterol, involving mainly TM1 and TM2, and TM5, respectively. Altogether, our results provide insights into the effect of intracellular binding partners on the GPCR activation mechanism, which should be taken into account in structure-based drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.