Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34779884›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2022

Contemporary options and future perspectives: three examples highlighting the challenges in testicular cancer imaging.

Gamal Anton Wakileh, Christian Ruf, Axel Heidenreich, Klaus-Peter Dieckmann, Catharina Lisson, Vikas Prasad, Christian Bolenz, Friedemann Zengerling

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Special Issue on Testis Cancer.World journal of urology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gamal Anton WakilehDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Christian RufDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, Cologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Klaus-Peter DieckmannDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Catharina LissonDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Vikas PrasadDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany. Vikas.Prasad@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Christian BolenzDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. Christian.Bolenz@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. friedemann.zengerling@uniklinik-ulm.de.
University Hospital Ulm · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

ferdinand eisenberger scholarship programme WaG1/Fe-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne of the main issues in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) management is to reduce the necessary amount of treatment to achieve cure. Excess treatment burden may arise from late diagnosis of the primary as well as from false positive or negative staging results. Correct imaging is of paramount importance for successful management of TGCT. The aim of this review is to point out the current state of the art as well as innovative developments in TGCT imaging on the basis of three common challenging clinical situations.

methodsA selective literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline as well as in recent conference proceedings.

resultsRegarding small testicular lesions, recent studies using elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed promising data for differentiation between benign and malignant histology. For borderline enlarged lymph nodes FDG-PET-CT performance is unsatisfactory, promising new techniques as lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI is the subject of research in this field. Regarding the assessment of postchemotherapeutic residual masses, the use of conventional computerized tomography (CT) together with serum tumor markers is still the standard of care. To avoid overtreatment in this setting, new imaging modalities like diffusion-weighted MRI and radiomics are currently under investigation. For follow-up of clinical stage I TGCTs, the use of MRI is non-inferior to CT while omitting radiation exposure.

conclusionFurther efforts should be made to refine imaging for TGCT patients, which is of high relevance for the guidance of treatment decisions as well as the associated treatment burdens and oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyUltrasonographyGerm cell tumorsImagingNon-seminomaSeminomaSmall testicular massesStagingTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID34779884
PMCPMC8921012
OpenAlexW3212003878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.