ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Advances in Imaging of Subbasal Corneal Nerves With Micro-Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal nerve regeneration: treatments and monitoring approaches.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Corneal nerve imaging in systemic neuropathy: A minireview of experimental and precision medicine applications.World journal of experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Automated dual-camera DMD system for stereo optical sectioning imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway glioma using in vivo confocal microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- In-vivo corneal confocal microscopy: Imaging analysis, biological insights and future directions.Communications biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the most peripheral corneal nerve plexus using high-resolution micro-optical coherence tomography (µOCT) imaging and to assess µOCT's clinical potential as a screening tool for corneal and systemic diseases. Methods: An experimental high-resolution (1.5 × 1.5 × 1 µm) µOCT setup was applied for three-dimensional imaging of the subbasal nerve plexus in nonhuman primates (NHPs) and swine within 3 hours postmortem. Morphologic features of subbasal nerves in µOCT were compared to β3 tubulin-stained fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM). Parameters such as nerve density, nerve distribution, and imaging repeatability were evaluated, using semiautomatic image analysis in form of a custom corneal surface segmentation algorithm and NeuronJ. Results: Swine and NHP corneas showed the species-specific nerve morphology in both imaging modalities. Most fibers showed a linear course, forming a highly parallel pattern, converging in a vortex with overall nerve densities varying between 9.51 and 24.24 mm/mm2. The repeatability of nerve density quantification of the µOCT scans as approximately 88% in multiple image recordings of the same cornea. Conclusions: Compared to the current gold standard of FCM, µOCT's larger field of view of currently 1 × 1 mm increases the conclusiveness of density measurements, which, coupled with µOCT's feature of not requiring direct contact, shows promise for future clinical application. The nerve density quantification may be relevant for screening for systemic disease (e.g., peripheral neuropathy). Translational Relevance: Technological advances in OCT technology may enable a quick assessment of corneal nerve density, which could be valuable evaluating ophthalmic and systemic peripheral innervation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.