Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34779784›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Attitudes and Beliefs in Canada: National Cross-sectional Survey and Cluster Analysis.

Jamie L Benham, Omid Atabati, Robert J Oxoby, Mehdi Mourali, Blake Shaffer, Hasan Sheikh, Jean-Christophe Boucher, Cora Constantinescu, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Noah M Ivers and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Individual and Environmental Correlations with Vaccination Status in Canada: The COHESION study.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. "Just be honest with us": A qualitative analysis of Canadians' public trust during the COVID-19 pandemic.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jamie L BenhamDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-4613
Omid AtabatiDepartment of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-7286
Robert J OxobyDepartment of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6467-2573
Mehdi MouraliHaskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9969-3892
Blake ShafferDepartment of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-8075
Hasan SheikhDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3280-361X
Jean-Christophe BoucherSchool of Public Policy and Department of Political Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-6572
Cora ConstantinescuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-5756
Jeanna Parsons LeighSchool of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8408-674X
Noah M IversInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2500-2435
Scott C RatzanSchool of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5118-4506
Madison M FullertonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8345-2859
Theresa TangDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-5953
Braden J MannsDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-6127
Deborah A MarshallDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-8008
Jia Hu *Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-3985
Raynell Lang *Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0268-4680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are concerns that vaccine hesitancy may impede COVID-19 vaccine rollout and prevent the achievement of herd immunity. Vaccine hesitancy is a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite their availability.

objectiveWe aimed to identify which people are more and less likely to take a COVID-19 vaccine and factors associated with vaccine hesitancy to inform public health messaging.

methodsA Canadian cross-sectional survey was conducted in Canada in October and November 2020, prior to the regulatory approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy was measured by respondents answering the question "what would you do if a COVID-19 vaccine were available to you?" Negative binomial regression was used to identify the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. Cluster analysis was performed to identify distinct clusters based on intention to take a COVID-19 vaccine, beliefs about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, and adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions.

resultsOf 4498 participants, 2876 (63.9%) reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy was significantly associated with (1) younger age (18-39 years), (2) lower education, and (3) non-Liberal political leaning. Participants that reported vaccine hesitancy were less likely to believe that a COVID-19 vaccine would end the pandemic or that the benefits of a COVID-19 vaccine outweighed the risks. Individuals with vaccine hesitancy had higher prevalence of being concerned about vaccine side effects, lower prevalence of being influenced by peers or health care professionals, and lower prevalence of trust in government institutions.

conclusionsThese findings can be used to inform targeted public health messaging to combat vaccine hesitancy as COVID-19 vaccine administration continues. Messaging related to preventing COVID among friends and family, highlighting the benefits, emphasizing safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination, and ensuring that health care workers are knowledgeable and supported in their vaccination counselling may be effective for vaccine-hesitant populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultAttitudeCanadaCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2Vaccination HesitancyYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesattitudesbehaviorbeliefCanadacommunicationcompliancecoronavirusCOVID-19cross-sectionaleducationethnicitygenderhesitancyincomemarketingpublic healthraceriskrisk reductionvaccine

Identifiers

PMID34779784
PMCPMC8709417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.