Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34779722›Full record

ReviewThe journal of spinal cord medicine2021

Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation and exercise after spinal cord injury.

Hang Jin Jo, Michael S A Richardson, Martin Oudega, Monica A Perez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hang Jin JoShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9804-1219
Michael S A RichardsonEdward Jr. Hines VA Medical Center, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Martin OudegaShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Monica A PerezShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Northwestern University · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · US

Funding

From Neural Control of Movement to Treatments for Spinal Cord InjuryR35NS122336 · NINDS · REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO D/B/A SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB · PI Monica A Perez · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
Corticospinal Function after Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS090622 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Closed loop control of vibration for muscle spasms after human spinal cord injury: efficacy and mechanismR01NS100810 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090622NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100810NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS122336RRD VA I01 RX002474RRD VA I01 RX002848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI) relies on the use of exercise training, which has limited functional gains. There is a need to develop more efficient approaches to facilitate recovery after SCI.

methodsThis review focuses on a neuromodulation method where transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex is paired with transcutaneous electrical stimulation over a peripheral nerve to induce plasticity at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses. These two stimuli are applied at precise inter-stimulus intervals to reinforce corticospinal synaptic transmission using principles of spike-timing-dependent plasticity applied alone or in combination with exercise training.

resultsTransmission in residual corticospinal axons, assessed using TMS and maximal voluntary motor output, increased after stimulation combined with exercise training in persons with SCI. There were also significant improvements in functional outcomes, including walking speed and grasping function, which persisted after 6-9 months post stimulation. Moreover, the data suggested that the effects of the stimulation protocol can be augmented with a higher number of sessions and with multiple stimulation sites in the spinal cord.

conclusionsVoluntary movement is enhanced in people with SCI through the strengthening of corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses using paired stimulation. This neuromodulation technique represents a novel powerful strategy to facilitate functional recovery after SCI.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorExerciseHumansNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal TractsSpinal CordTranscranial Magnetic StimulationNon-invasive brain stimulationPhysiology of magnetic stimulationRehabilitationSpinal cord injurySpinal plasticity

Identifiers

PMID34779722
PMCPMC8604481
OpenAlexW3211838478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.