Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34779719›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2021

Development of the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline: Methods and overview.

Eleni M Patsakos, Mark T Bayley, Ailene Kua, Christiana Cheng, Janice Eng, Chester Ho, Vanessa K Noonan, Matthew Querée, B Catharine Craven, Can-SCIP Guideline Expert Panel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the Lived Experiences of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eleni M PatsakosKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4256-9150
Mark T BayleyKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-9463
Ailene KuaKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2602-9058
Christiana ChengPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3095-1726
Janice EngDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0788
Chester HoDivision of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4238-5506
Vanessa K NoonanPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3226-9218
Matthew QueréeGF Strong Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-1496
B Catharine CravenKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8234-6803
Can-SCIP Guideline Expert PanelKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-altering injury that leads to a complex constellation of changes in an individual's sensory, motor, and autonomic function which is largely determined by the level and severity of cord impairment. Available SCI-specific clinical practice guidelines (CPG) address specific impairments, health conditions or a segment of the care continuum, however, fail to address all the important clinical questions arising throughout an individual's care journey. To address this gap, an interprofessional panel of experts in SCI convened to develop the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline. This article provides an overview of the methods underpinning the Can-SCIP Guideline process.

methodsThe Can-SCIP Guideline was developed using the Guidelines Adaptation Cycle. A comprehensive search for existing SCI-specific CPGs was conducted. The quality of eligible CPGs was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. An expert panel (

resultsThe Can-SCIP Guideline includes 585 total recommendations from 41 guidelines, 96 recommendations that pertain to the Components of the Ideal SCI Care System section, and 489 recommendations that pertain to the Management of Secondary Health Conditions section. Most recommendations (

conclusionThe Can-SCIP Guideline is the first living comprehensive guideline for adults with SCI in Canada across the care continuum.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultCanadaContinuity of Patient CareHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical practice guidelinesEvidence-based practiceKnowledge translationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID34779719
PMCPMC8604491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.