Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Relationship of Neighborhood Deprivation and Outcomes of a Comprehensive ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Protocol.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in the rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resulting in favourable neurological outcomes according to the regional deprivation index.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Association of a Comprehensive ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Protocol With Key Process Metrics Among Patients Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic Disparities and In-Hospital Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case-Control Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Rurality and Area Deprivation and Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Racial, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Disparities in Preamputation Vascular Care for Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Observational
- Association of neighborhood-level disadvantage beyond individual sociodemographic factors in patients with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Social Phenotyping for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Electronic Health Registries.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Outcomes for Common Cardiovascular Conditions.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Characteristics of hospital and health system initiatives to address social determinants of health in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty: are they associated with medical complications, healthcare utilization, and payments for care?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Disparities in PCSK9 Initiation Among US Veterans with Peripheral Arterial Disease or Cerebrovascular Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background We evaluated whether a comprehensive ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction protocol (CSP) focusing on guideline-directed medical therapy, transradial percutaneous coronary intervention, and rapid door-to-balloon time improves process and outcome metrics in patients with moderate or high socioeconomic deprivation. Methods and Results A total of 1761 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at a single hospital before (January 1, 2011-July 14, 2014) and after (July 15, 2014- July 15, 2019) CSP implementation were included in an observational cohort study. Neighborhood deprivation was assessed by the Area Deprivation Index and was categorized as low (≤50th percentile; 29.0%), moderate (51st -90th percentile; 40.8%), and high (>90th percentile; 30.2%). The primary process outcome was door-to-balloon time. Achievement of guideline-recommend door-to-balloon time goals improved in all deprivation groups after CSP implementation (low, 67.8% before CSP versus 88.5% after CSP; moderate, 50.7% before CSP versus 77.6% after CSP; high, 65.5% before CSP versus 85.6% after CSP; all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.