ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Prognostic Role of Myocardial Edema as Evidenced by Early Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac MRI after Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging contributing to primary prevention and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death: Contemporary usefulness and limitations.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic usefulness and limitation of cardiac magnetic resonance for identifying myocardial damage in survivors of cardiac arrest in midtown.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value and clinical impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients after sudden cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.Open heart · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Review of Endometrial Cancer: New Molecular and FIGO Classification and Recent Treatment Changes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of Myocardial Edema Development in CVD Pathophysiology.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Detected Acute Myocardial Edema as Predictor of Favourable Prognosis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmia of Unclear Cause in Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Editorial: Advances in the prevention and treatment of sudden cardiac death.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of sex and role of coronary artery disease in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting with refractory ventricular arrhythmias.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Editorial: Strategies to improve management of ventricular tachycardias.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Multimodality Imaging of Sudden Cardiac Death and Acute Complications in Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- State-of-the-Art Multimodality Imaging in Sudden Cardiac Arrest with Focus on Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Advanced imaging for risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The Bright Side of Myocardial Edema.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) may be caused by an acute and reversible myocardial injury, a chronic and irreversible myocardial damage, or a primary ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may identify myocardial edema (ME), which denotes acute and reversible myocardial damage. We evaluated the arrhythmic outcome of SCA survivors during follow-up and tested the prognostic role of ME. Methods and Results We included a consecutive series of 101 (71% men, median age 47 years) SCA survivors from 9 collaborative centers who underwent early (<1 month) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). On T2-weighted sequences, ME was found in 18 of 101 (18%) patients. According to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings, the arrhythmic SCA was ascribed to acute myocardial injury (either ischemic [n=10] or inflammatory [n=8]), to chronic structural heart diseases (ischemic heart disease [n=11], cardiomyopathy [n=20], or other [n=23]), or to primarily arrhythmic syndrome (n=29). During a follow-up of 47 months (28 to 67 months), 24 of 101 (24%) patients received an appropriate ICD intervention. ME was associated with a significantly higher survival free from both any ICD interventions (log-rank=0.04) and ICD shocks (log-rank=0.03) and remained an independent predictor of better arrhythmic outcome after adjustment for left ventricular ejection fraction and late gadolinium enhancement. The risk of appropriate ICD intervention was unrelated to the type of underlying heart disease. Conclusions ME on early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which denotes an acute and transient arrhythmogenic substrate, predicted a favorable long-term arrhythmic outcome of SCA survivors. These findings may have a substantial impact on future guidelines on the management of SCA survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.