Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34779063›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2022

Patient-reported outcomes from the JADE COMPARE randomized phase 3 study of abrocitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

J P Thyssen, G Yosipovitch, C Paul, S G Kwatra, C-Y Chu, M DiBonaventura, C Feeney, F Zhang, D Myers, R Rojo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association of risk of incident acne and treatment with systemic Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. How to Understand Personalized Medicine in Atopic Dermatitis Nowadays?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

J P ThyssenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-1743
G YosipovitchDepartment of Dermatology and Itch Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
C PaulToulouse University and CHU, Toulouse, France.
S G KwatraDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-1515
C-Y ChuDepartment of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-3279
M DiBonaventuraPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
C FeeneyPfizer Ltd., Surrey, UK.
F ZhangPfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.
D MyersPfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.
R RojoPfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.
H ValdezPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Pfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn JADE COMPARE, abrocitinib improved severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) and demonstrated rapid itch relief.

objectivesWe examined clinically meaningful improvements in selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

methodsJADE COMPARE was a multicentre, phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive 16 weeks of oral abrocitinib 200 or 100 mg once daily, dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks, or placebo, with background topical therapy. PROs included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Night Time Itch Scale (NTIS), Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis, Patient Global Assessment, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

resultsAt week 16, the proportion of patients achieving POEM scores <3 was 21.3% and 11.7% for 200 and 100 mg abrocitinib, 12.4% for dupilumab, and 4.8% for placebo (vs. abrocitinib, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.04). Proportion achieving ≥4-point improvement from baseline in NTIS severity was 64.3% and 52.4% for 200 and 100 mg abrocitinib, 54.0% for dupilumab, and 34.4% for placebo (vs. abrocitinib, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.007). Proportion achieving ≥4-point improvement from baseline in DLQI was 85.0% and 74.4% for 200 and 100 mg abrocitinib, 83.4% for dupilumab, and 59.7% for placebo (vs. abrocitinib, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.005).

conclusionSignificant improvements in PROs were demonstrated with both abrocitinib doses vs. placebo, and abrocitinib 200 mg provided numerically greater effects compared with dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicEczemaAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPyrimidinesSeverity of Illness IndexSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeabrocitinibPyrimidinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID34779063
PMCPMC9300205
OpenAlexW3211634059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.