Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778984›Full record

ArticleArtificial organs2022

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19: A scoping review.

Massimiliano Polastri, Justyna Swol, Antonio Loforte, Andrea Dell'Amore

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial organs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Massimiliano PolastriDepartment of Continuity of Care and Disability, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-0813
Justyna SwolDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University General Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2903-092X
Antonio LoforteDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Diseases, Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-0477
Andrea Dell'AmoreDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-7441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed severe difficulties in managing critically ill patients in hospital care settings. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has been proven to be lifesaving support during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The purpose of this review was to describe the rehabilitative treatments provided to patients undergoing ECMO support during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe searched PubMed and Scopus for English-language studies published from the databases' inception until June 30, 2021. We excluded editorials, letters to the editor, and studies that did not describe rehabilitative procedures during ECMO support. We also excluded those articles not written in English.

resultsA total of 50 articles were identified. We ultimately included nine studies, seven of which were case reports. Only two studies had more than one patient; an observational design analyzing the clinical course of 19 patients and a case series of three patients. Extracorporeal support duration varied from 9 to 49 days, and the primary indication was acute respiratory distress syndrome COVID-19-related. Rehabilitative treatment mainly consisted of in-bed mobilization, postural transfers (including sitting), and respiratory exercises. After hospital discharge, patients were referred to rehabilitation facilities. Physiotherapeutic interventions provided during ECMO support and after its discontinuation were feasible and safe.

conclusionThe physiotherapeutic treatment of patients undergoing ECMO support includes several components and must be provided in a multidisciplinary context. The optimal approach depends on the patient's status, including sedation, level of consciousness, ECMO configuration, types of cannulas, and cannulation site.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2COVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansPhysical Therapy Modalitiesacute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19ECMOexerciserehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34778984
PMCPMC8652633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.