Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778815›Full record

ArticleSN business & economics2021

Understanding the dynamics emerging from infodemics: a call to action for interdisciplinary research.

Stephan Leitner, Bartosz Gula, Dietmar Jannach, Ulrike Krieg-Holz, Friederike Wall

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in SN business & economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephan LeitnerDepartment of Management Control and Strategic Management, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6790-4651
Bartosz GulaCognitive Psychology Unit, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4741-764X
Dietmar JannachDepartment of Applied Informatics, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4698-8507
Ulrike Krieg-HolzDepartment of German Studies, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Friederike WallDepartment of Management Control and Strategic Management, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-8558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on infodemics, i.e., the rapid spread of (mis)information related to a hazardous event, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, requires integrating a multiplicity of scientific disciplines. The dynamics emerging from infodemics have the potential to generate complex behavioral patterns. To react appropriately, it is of ultimate importance for the fields of Business and Economics to understand these dynamics. In the short run, they might lead to an adaptation in household spending or to a shift in buying behavior towards online providers. In the long run, changes in investments, consumer behavior, and markets are to be expected. We argue that the dynamics emerge from complex interactions among multiple factors, such as information and misinformation accessible to individuals and the formation and revision of beliefs. (Mis)information accessible to individuals is, amongst others, affected by algorithms specifically designed to provide personalized information, while automated fact-checking algorithms can help reduce the amount of circulating misinformation. The formation and revision of individual (and probably false) beliefs and individual fact-checking and interpretation of information are heavily affected by linguistic patterns inherent to information during pandemics and infodemics and further factors, such as affect, intuition, and motives. We argue that, to get a deep(er) understanding of the dynamics emerging from infodemics, the fields of Business and Economics should integrate the perspectives of Computer Science and Information Systems, (Computational) Linguistics, and Cognitive Science into the wider context of economic systems (e.g., organizations, markets or industries) and propose a way to do so. As research on infodemics is a strongly interdisciplinary field and the integration of the above-mentioned disciplines is a first step towards a holistic approach, we conclude with a call to action which should encourage researchers to collaborate across scientific disciplines and unfold collective creativity, which will substantially advance research on infodemics.

Indexed as

Cognitive psychology and cognitive scienceComplex systemsComputer science and information systemsFalse beliefsGuided self-organizationInfodemicsLanguage signalsLinguistics and computational linguisticsRecommender systems

Identifiers

PMID34778815
PMCPMC7798384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.