ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2021
Evaluation of Coronary Plaques and Stents with Conventional and Photon-counting CT: Benefits of High-Resolution Photon-counting CT.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photon-counting CT versus energy-integrating detectors for cardiac imaging: a systematic review of evidence from in vivo human studies on image quality and radiation dose.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Photon-counting detector CT vs energy-integrating detector CT for the diagnosis of arterial dissection in the cervicocerebral region: A single-center case series.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Application and Development of Spectral CT in Target Delineation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Photon-counting computed tomography in coronary artery bypass grafting planning and follow-up: a narrative review of a high-resolution adjunct to invasive angiography.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Feasibility of On-Site CT-FFR Analysis in Ruling Out In-Stent Restenosis on Cardiac PCCT.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Design of a next-generation conventional scintillator x-ray detector: Improved spatial resolution and fill factor.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Ultra-high spatial resolution at photon-counting computed tomography: technical insights and sustainable applications in cardiothoracic imaging.European radiology experimental · 2026Review
- Assessment of Image Quality Performance of a Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Scanner Approved for Whole-Body Clinical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Spectral ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT for coronary stent imaging: evaluation in a dynamic phantom.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Impact of vessel size, dose levels, and body habitus on iodine quantification in cardiovascular photon-counting computed tomography.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Multilayer and crushed stent visualization using photon- counting detector computed tomography - a proof of concept.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Joint CT reconstruction of anatomy and implants using a mixed prior model.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography and Coronary Plaque Analysis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Ultra-high-resolution 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging using spectral photon-counting CT in high-risk patients for coronary stenoses.European radiology · 2025Article
- Influence of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions on coronary CT angiography-based fractional flow reserve with photon-counting detector CT: intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Value of Ultrahigh-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography in Cardiac Imaging.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Computed Tomography Angiography in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Guide Towards Optimizing Coronary Interventions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Health improvements by understanding residual risk in coronary artery disease and new targets for prevention/treatment: rationale and research protocol of the HURRICANE project.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- In-Stent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Versus Third-Generation Dual-Source Energy-Integrating Detector CT Phantom Study in Seven Different Stent Types.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with silicon-based photon-counting computed tomography (CT): A simulation-based feasibility study.Medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the performance of energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, photon-counting detector CT (PCCT), and high-resolution PCCT (HR-PCCT) for the visualization of coronary plaques and reduction of stent artifacts in a phantom model. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn investigational scanner with EID and PCCT subsystems was used to image a coronary artery phantom containing cylindrical probes simulating different plaque compositions. The phantom was imaged with and without coronary stents using both subsystems. Images were reconstructed with a clinical cardiac kernel and an additional HR-PCCT kernel. Regions of interest were drawn around probes and evaluated for in-plane diameter and a qualitative comparison by expert readers. A linear mixed-effects model was used to compare the diameter results, and a Shrout-Fleiss intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess consistency in the reader study.
resultsComparing in-plane diameter to the physical dimension for nonstented and stented phantoms, measurements of the HR-PCCT images were more accurate (nonstented: 4.4% ± 1.1 [standard deviation], stented: -9.4% ± 4.6) than EID (nonstented: 15.5% ± 4.0, stented: -19.5% ± 5.8) and PCCT (nonstented: 19.4% ± 2.5, stented: -18.3% ± 4.4). Our analysis of variance found diameter measurements to be different across image groups for both nonstented and stented cases (
conclusionDespite increased noise, HR-PCCT images were able to better visualize coronary plaques and reduce stent artifacts compared with EID or PCCT reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.