ReviewSocio-ecological practice research2021
Seven approaches to research in socio-ecological practice & five insights from the RWC-Schön-Stokes model.
Review in Socio-ecological practice research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI as an accelerator for defining new problems that transcends boundaries.BioData mining · 2025Article
- When the processSocio-ecological practice research · 2023Article
- Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems.Socio-ecological practice research · 2022Article
- Fifty years after the wicked-problems conception: its practical and theoretical impacts on planning and design.Socio-ecological practice research · 2022Article
- Compassion practice, evolutionary advantage, and social resilience: the triad worth SEPR community's attention.Socio-ecological practice research · 2021Article
- "The trouble", its maker, and Yang Gui's confidence in "taming the troublemaker" with a 1962 bilateral agreement.Socio-ecological practice research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review article, I examine seven commonly used approaches to research in socio-ecological practice and share insights about their defining characteristics, similarities, differences and connections. I derived these approaches and gained insights through the RWC-Schön-Stokes model, a theoretical framework for codifying, tabulating, examining and comparing multiple ways of methodical knowing in socio-ecological systems. For this reason, I begin with an introduction of the model and, in a chronological order, provide a review of its association with three intellectual ancestors: the Bush linear model (1945), the Stokes quadrant model (1997) and the Schön-Stokes model (2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.