Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778710›Full record

ArticleSocio-ecological practice research2021

Four shareworthy SEPR scenario ideas.

Tom Daniels, Jeffrey K H Chan, Stephen Kankam, Michael Murphy, Don Day, Christine Fürst, Justice Nana Inkoom, Hongmi Koo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Socio-ecological practice research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tom DanielsThe University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Jeffrey K H ChanSingapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), Singapore, Singapore.
Stephen KankamMartin Luther Universität, Halle-wittenberg, Germany.
Michael MurphyTexas A&M University, College Station, TX USA.
Don DayMason, TX USA.
Christine FürstMartin Luther Universität, Halle-wittenberg, Germany.
Justice Nana InkoomHen Mpoano, Takoradi, Ghana.
Hongmi KooMartin Luther Universität, Halle-wittenberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this communication article, we share our scenario ideas at the request of the journal editor. These are (1) a scenario for building sustainable suburbs; (2) a counterfactual scenario for coping with the super wicked COVID problem; (3) envisioning alternative futures of cultural ecosystem services supplies in Southwestern Ghana; and (4) a path toward writing successful scenarios. The ideas will be fully developed in due course into scholarly articles for the journal.

Indexed as

AdroitnessCounterfactual scenariosCreative thinkingCultural ecosystem services (CES)ScenariosSouthwestern GhanaSuper wicked problemSustainable suburbs

Identifiers

PMID34778710
PMCPMC7905964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.