Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778435›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review.

Ines Andretta, Felipe M W Hickmann, Aline Remus, Carolina H Franceschi, Alexandre B Mariani, Catiane Orso, Marcos Kipper, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, Candido Pomar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phytase in Pig Diets: Technical and Economic Evaluation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Influence of Alternative Diets and Whole Dry Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ines AndrettaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Felipe M W HickmannDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Aline RemusSherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Carolina H FranceschiDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre B MarianiDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Catiane OrsoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marcos KipperElanco Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marie-Pierre Létourneau-MontminyDépartement des Sciences Animales, Faculté des Sciences de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Candido PomarSherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pig and poultry production systems have reached high-performance levels over the last few decades. However, there is still room for improvement when it comes to their environmental sustainability. This issue is even more relevant due to the growing demand for food demand since this surplus food production needs to be met at an affordable cost with minimum impact on the environment. This study presents a systematic review of peer-reviewed manuscripts that investigated the environmental impacts associated with pig and poultry production. For this purpose, independent reviews were performed and two databases were constructed, one for each production system. Previous studies published in peer-reviewed journals were considered for the databases if the method of life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to pig (pork meat) or poultry (broiler meat or table eggs) production to estimate at least the potential effects of climate change, measured as CO

Indexed as

broilersclimate changeenvironmentlaying henslivestockprecision feedingsustainabilityswine

Identifiers

PMID34778435
PMCPMC8578682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.