Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778420›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Clinical Application of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Russell Franks, Sven Plein, Amedeo Chiribiri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Current Use and Complementary Value of CombiningFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Russell FranksSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sven PleinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amedeo ChiribiriSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/71/34009British Heart Foundation TG/18/2/33768Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functionally significant coronary artery disease impairs myocardial blood flow and can be detected non-invasively by myocardial perfusion imaging. While multiple myocardial perfusion imaging modalities exist, the high spatial and temporal resolution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), combined with its freedom from ionising radiation make it an attractive option. Dynamic contrast enhanced CMR perfusion imaging has become a well-validated non-invasive tool for the assessment and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease and is recommended by international guidelines. This article presents an overview of CMR perfusion imaging and its clinical application, with a focus on chronic coronary syndromes, highlighting its strengths and challenges, and discusses recent advances, including the emerging role of quantitative perfusion analysis.

Indexed as

cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)coronary artery diseasedynamic contrast enhance magnetic resonancefirst-pass perfusion MRImyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)quantitative perfusion

Identifiers

PMID34778420
PMCPMC8585782
OpenAlexW3210229400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.