Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Sex in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Erito Marques de Souza Filho, Fernando de Amorim Fernandes, Maria Gabriela Ribeiro Portela, Pedro Heliodoro Newlands, Lucas Nunes Dalbonio de Carvalho, Tadeu Francisco Dos Santos, Alair Augusto Sarmet M D Dos Santos, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita, Flávio Luiz Seixas, Claudio Tinoco Mesquita and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erito Marques de Souza FilhoPost-graduation in Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Fernando de Amorim FernandesPost-graduation in Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Maria Gabriela Ribeiro PortelaDepartment of Psychology, Hospital Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pedro Heliodoro NewlandsDepartment of Education, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lucas Nunes Dalbonio de CarvalhoDepartment of Languages and Technologies, Universidade Federal Rural Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tadeu Francisco Dos SantosDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Alair Augusto Sarmet M D Dos SantosPost-graduation in Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Evandro Tinoco MesquitaPost-graduation in Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Flávio Luiz SeixasInstitute of Computing, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Claudio Tinoco MesquitaPost-graduation in Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Ronaldo Altenburg GismondiPost-graduation in Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BRHospital Pró-Cardíaco · BRInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an essential tool used to diagnose and manage patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Additionally, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) represents a milestone about individuals' data security concerns. On the other hand, Machine Learning (ML) has had several applications in the most diverse knowledge areas. It is conceived as a technology with huge potential to revolutionize health care. In this context, we developed ML models to evaluate their ability to distinguish an individual's sex from MPI assessment. We used 260 polar maps (140 men/120 women) to train ML algorithms from a database of patients referred to a university hospital for clinically indicated MPI from January 2016 to December 2018. We tested 07 different ML models, namely, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Boosting (AB), Random Forests (RF) and, Gradient Boosting (GB). We used a cross-validation strategy. Our work demonstrated that ML algorithms could perform well in assessing the sex of patients undergoing myocardial scintigraphy exams. All the models had accuracy greater than 82%. However, only SVM achieved 90%. KNN, RF, AB, GB had, respectively, 88, 86, 85, 83%. Accuracy standard deviation was lower in KNN, AB, and RF (0.06). SVM and RF had had the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.93), followed by GB (0.92), KNN (0.91), AB, and NB (0.9). SVM and AB achieved the best precision. Our results bring some challenges regarding the autonomy of patients who wish to keep sex information confidential and certainly add greater complexity to the debate about what data should be considered sensitive to the light of the GDPR.

Indexed as

general data protection regulationhealth caremachine learningmyocardial perfusion imagingsex

Identifiers

PMID34778403
PMCPMC8585770
OpenAlexW3210716775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.