Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34778171›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Epidemiological Predictive Modeling of COVID-19 Infection: Development, Testing, and Implementation on the Population of the Benelux Union.

Tijana Šušteršič, Andjela Blagojević, Danijela Cvetković, Aleksandar Cvetković, Ivan Lorencin, Sandi Baressi Šegota, Dragan Milovanović, Dejan Baskić, Zlatan Car, Nenad Filipović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tijana ŠušteršičFaculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Andjela BlagojevićFaculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Danijela CvetkovićInstitute for Information Technologies, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Aleksandar CvetkovićDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Ivan LorencinFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Sandi Baressi ŠegotaFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Dragan MilovanovićClinical Centre Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Dejan BaskićFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Zlatan CarFaculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Nenad FilipovićFaculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the whole world has taken interest in the mechanisms of its spread and development. Mathematical models have been valuable instruments for the study of the spread and control of infectious diseases. For that purpose, we propose a two-way approach in modeling COVID-19 spread: a susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered, deceased (SEIRD) model based on differential equations and a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning model. The SEIRD model is a compartmental epidemiological model with included components: susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered, deceased. In the case of the SEIRD model, official statistical data available online for countries of Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg (Benelux) in the period of March 15 2020 to March 15 2021 were used. Based on them, we have calculated key parameters and forward them to the epidemiological model, which will predict the number of infected, deceased, and recovered people. Results show that the SEIRD model is able to accurately predict several peaks for all the three countries of interest, with very small root mean square error (RMSE), except for the mild cases (maximum RMSE was 240.79 ± 90.556), which can be explained by the fact that no official data were available for mild cases, but this number was derived from other statistics. On the other hand, LSTM represents a special kind of recurrent neural network structure that can comparatively learn long-term temporal dependencies. Results show that LSTM is capable of predicting several peaks based on the position of previous peaks with low values of RMSE. Higher values of RMSE are observed in the number of infected cases in Belgium (RMSE was 535.93) and Netherlands (RMSE was 434.28), and are expected because of thousands of people getting infected per day in those countries. In future studies, we will extend the models to include mobility information, variants of concern, as well as a medical intervention, etc. A prognostic model could help us predict epidemic peaks. In that way, we could react in a timely manner by introducing new or tightening existing measures before the health system is overloaded.

Indexed as

COVID-19BelgiumHumansLuxembourgNetherlandsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19disease spread modelingepidemiological modelLSTM modelSEIRD model

Identifiers

PMID34778171
PMCPMC8580942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.