ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prostate cancer in China: epidemiological trends, genomic insights, and future directions for optimized management.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- [Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The association of quantitative PSMA PET parameters with pathologic ISUP grade: an international multicenter analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Metastatic Superscan inMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2024Article
- Predictive value of volumetric parameters based onFrontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Evaluating the value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023Article
- The efficacy ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The prognostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- 18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Unmasked the Characteristics of Prostate Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of a radiomics nomogram derived from Fluoride-18 PSMA-1007 PET/CT for risk stratification in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- TheFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the prediction performance of MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 101 consecutively patients with biopsy or radical prostatectomy proved PCa who underwent
resultsThe PET/CT parameters were all higher in high risk stratification subgroups (tPSA>20 ng/mL, GS ≥ 8, and tPSA>20 ng/mL and/or GS ≥ 8, respectively) with high sensitivity (86.89%, 90.16% and 83.61%, respectively). The SUVmax, tPSA and GS could effectively predict distant metastatic with high sensitivity of SUVmax (90.50%) compared with tPSA (57.14%) and GS (55.61%). With a cutoff value of 29.01ng/mL for tPSA, the detection rate of distant metastasis between low and high prediction tPSA group had statistical differences (50.00% vs. 76.60%, respectively; P = 0.006) which was not found on guideline tPSA level (P>0.05). 6/15 (40%) patients tPSA between 20ng/mL to 29.01ng/mL without distant metastases may change the risk stratification. Finally, tPSA had a partial mediating effect on SUVmax of primary tumors and metastases lesions.
conclusionThe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.