ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a single-unit experience of over 200 patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Recent Trends in Surgical Strategies of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Open versus laparoscopic oncologic resection for gallbladder cancer after index cholecystectomy: international multicenter comparative study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a propensity score-matched comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery in treating patients with gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- LaparoscopicWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Estimating the influencing factors for T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer on survival and surgical approaches selection.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Indocyanine Green-Guided Laparoscopic Redo Surgery for Incidental T2a Gallbladder Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Identification of publication characteristics and research trends in the management of gallbladder cancer.iLIVER · 2022Article
- Robotic Surgery for Biliary Tract Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary laparoscopic approach (PLA) for T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains contradicted. We aimed to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes after PLA versus open approach (OA) for T1b/T2 GBC.
methodsPatients with resected T1b/T2 GBC were selected from our hospital between January 2011 and August 2018. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and several secondary outcomes were used to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify significant risk factors for OS/DFS in GBC patients undergoing PLA/OA.
resultsA total of 114 patients who underwent OA (n = 61) or PLA (n = 53) were included in the study. The percent of PLA cases was increased over time from 40.0% in 2011 to 70.0% in 2018 (
conclusionsPLA for T1b/T2 GBC was comparable to OA in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes. Less positive LNs and well-differentiated tumors were independent predictors for better OS after PLA, and less positive LNs were also identified for better OS after OA. Additionally, younger age, without gallbladder stone, smaller tumor size, and less positive LNs were potential risk factors for better DFS after OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.