ArticleUrology case reports2022
Intra uterine device migrating into the bladder with stone formation.
Article in Urology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device complicated by giant bladder calculus formation: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- An intrauterine device disappeared for nine years: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Intrauterine device migration into the bladder with urolithiasis: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Intrauterine device (IUD) embedded in bladder wall with calculus formation treated with cystoscopy: a case report.Oxford medical case reports · 2024Article
- Bladder stone caused by misplaced intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- The Migration of an Intrauterine Device in the Bladder of an Asymptomatic Woman: A Case Report.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
- Forgotten Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Presenting as Vesicouterine Fistula - Migration or Misadventure.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An intrauterine device (IUD) perforating the uterus and bladder and creating a nidus for stone formation is rarely described in the international literature. A 50-year-old woman was referred to our department for 6 months history of suprapubic pain and pollakiuria without fever. Ultrasound, X-ray examination and abdominopelvic scanner confirmed an IUD perforating the uterus and the bladder. The stone on the perforating ectopic IUD was successfully removed with YAG Holmium Laser and the IUD was extracted without complications with the aid of a transurethral resectoscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.