ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021
Imaging update in arthroplasty.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative denosumab exposure and risk of revision after total hip and knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a registry-based data linkage study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Review
- Polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection and osteomyelitis of the tibia with circumferential abscess and skin ulcer 11 years after total knee arthroplasty.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging of metal implants has historically been difficult, regardless of the applied modality. The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing over the years. With it, we expect the number of symptomatic complications to increase as well. Acquiring accurate imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning for these cases is of paramount importance. Significant advancements have been made to reduce artifacts, leading to better imaging representation of arthroplasty. This review article would give a background on the current ways of imaging arthroplasty and metal implants, covering recent advances in imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.