ArticleComplex & intelligent systems2021
Complex T-spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their applications in multiple-criteria decision-making.
Article in Complex & intelligent systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dynamic complex intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi framework for multi-attribute decision-making with IoT applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A spherical fuzzy WASPAS approach with Dombi aggregation for satellite imagery tool selection in climate monitoring applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Precision measurement for effective pollution mitigation by evaluating air quality monitoring systems in linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy dombi environment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimization of autonomous vehicle control system reliability on a commercial scale through LIF dombi methodologies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimizing bioremediation techniques for soil decontamination in a linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multi-attribute decision-making method based on complex T-spherical fuzzy frank prioritized aggregation operators.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Multiple criteria decision analytic methods in management with T-spherical fuzzy information.Artificial intelligence review · 2023Article
- Systematic review of MCDM approach applied to the medical case studies of COVID-19: trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, motivations, recommendations, and future directions.Complex & intelligent systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex fuzzy (CF) sets (CFSs) have a significant role in modelling the problems involving two-dimensional information. Recently, the extensions of CFSs have gained the attention of researchers studying decision-making methods. The complex T-spherical fuzzy set (CTSFS) is an extension of the CFSs introduced in the last times. In this paper, we introduce the Dombi operations on CTSFSs. Based on Dombi operators, we define some aggregation operators, including complex T-spherical Dombi fuzzy weighted arithmetic averaging (CTSDFWAA) operator, complex T-spherical Dombi fuzzy weighted geometric averaging (CTSDFWGA) operator, complex T-spherical Dombi fuzzy ordered weighted arithmetic averaging (CTSDFOWAA) operator, complex T-spherical Dombi fuzzy ordered weighted geometric averaging (CTSDFOWGA) operator, and we obtain some of their properties. In addition, we develop a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method under the CTSF environment and present an algorithm for the proposed method. To show the process of the proposed method, we present an example related to diagnosing the COVID-19. Besides this, we present a sensitivity analysis to reveal the advantages and restrictions of our method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.