Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34777834›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2021

Molecular alterations of low-grade gliomas in young patients: Strategies and platforms for routine evaluation.

Iman Dandapath, Rituparna Chakraborty, Kavneet Kaur, Swati Mahajan, Jyotsna Singh, Mehar C Sharma, Chitra Sarkar, Vaishali Suri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iman DandapathDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rituparna ChakrabortyDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kavneet KaurDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Swati MahajanDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jyotsna SinghDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mehar C SharmaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vaishali SuriDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, it has been established that molecular biology of pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) is entirely distinct from adults. The majority of the circumscribed pediatric gliomas are driven by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which has yielded important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers. Further, the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT) Steering Committee in their fourth meeting, suggested including a panel of molecular markers for integrated diagnosis in "pediatric-type" diffuse gliomas. However, a designated set of platforms for the evaluation of these alterations has yet not been mentioned for easier implementation in routine molecular diagnostics. Herein, we have reviewed the relevance of analyzing these markers and discussed the strategies and platforms best apposite for clinical laboratories.

Indexed as

clinical trialdiffuse gliomasgliomamolecular diagnosticspediatric low-grade gliomaRAS/MAPK pathwaytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID34777834
PMCPMC8579091
OpenAlexW3195225316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.