Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34777621›Full record

ArticleCancer nanotechnology2021

Development of Fe

William Liu, Salida Mirzoeva, Ye Yuan, Junjing Deng, Si Chen, Barry Lai, Stefan Vogt, Karna Shah, Rahul Shroff, Reiner Bleher and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer nanotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

William LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Salida MirzoevaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Ye YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Junjing DengDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 USA.
Si ChenX-Ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 USA.
Barry LaiX-Ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 USA.
Stefan VogtX-Ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 USA.
Karna ShahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Rahul ShroffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Reiner BleherChemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 USA.
Qiaoling JinDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 USA.
Nghia VoDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, OX11 0DE UK.
Remon BazakDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.
Carissa RitnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Stanley GutionovDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Sumita RahaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Julia SedlmairSynchrotron Radiation Center, 3731 Schneider Drive, Stoughton, WI 53589-3097 USA.
Carol HirschmuglSynchrotron Radiation Center, 3731 Schneider Drive, Stoughton, WI 53589-3097 USA.
Chris JacobsenDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 USA.
Tatjana PauneskuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
John KalapurkalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
Gayle E WoloschakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9209-8954
Northwestern University · USArgonne National Laboratory · USStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource · USAlexandria University · EGDiamond Light Source · GB

Funding

TiO2 nanocomposites for Targeted Treatment and Imaging of Prostate cancerU54CA119341 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MIRKIN, CHAD A. · 2005 to 2009
$19.9M
Theranostic Magnetic Nanostructures for the Molecular Imaging of CancerU54CA151880 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MEADE, THOMAS J · 2010 to 2014
$11.5M
TR&D Project 3: Photoacoustic Detection of Metal Fluxes at the Tissue LevelP41GM135018 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBSEN, CHRIS JOHNSON, O'HALLORAN, THOMAS V · 2020 to 2024
$5.8M
Applications of TiO2-DNA nanocompositesR01EB002100 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOLOSCHAK, GAYLE E. · 2005 to 2013
$2.5M
Cryo ptychography combined with x-ray fluorescence analysis of metals in cellsR01GM104530 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI JACOBSEN, CHRIS JOHNSON · 2013 to 2020
$2.2M
Application of TiO2-DNA nanocomposites to Cancer CellsR01CA107467 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOLOSCHAK, GAYLE E. · 2004 to 2006
$960k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107467NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119341NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151880NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002100NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM135018NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid malignancy in childhood which, despite the current progress in radiotherapy and chemotherapy protocols, still has a high mortality rate in high risk tumors. Nanomedicine offers exciting and unexploited opportunities to overcome the shortcomings of conventional medicine. The photocatalytic properties of Fe

resultsThe uptake of bare and MIBG coated nanocomposites modestly sensitized neuroblastoma cells to ionizing radiation. Conversely, cells exposed to DOPAC coated nanocomposites exhibited a five-fold enhanced sensitivity to radiation, increased numbers of radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks, and apoptotic cell death. The addition of a peptide mimic of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) to nanoconjugates coated with MIBG altered their intracellular distribution. Cryo X-ray fluorescence microscopy tomography of frozen hydrated cells treated with these nanoconjugates revealed cytoplasmic as well as nuclear distribution of the nanoconstructs.

conclusionsThe intracellular distribution pattern of different nanoconjugates used in this study was different for different nanoconjugate surface molecules. Cells exposed to DOPAC covered nanoconjugates showed the smallest nanoconjugate uptake, with the most prominent pattern of large intracellular aggregates. Interestingly, cells treated with this nanoconjugate also showed the most pronounced radiosensitization effect in combination with the external beam x-ray irradiation. Further studies are necessary to evaluate mechanistic basis for this increased radiosensitization effect. Preliminary studies with the nanoparticles carrying an EGF mimicking peptide showed that this approach to targeting could perhaps be combined with a different approach to radiosensitization - use of nanoconjugates in combination with the radioactive iodine. Much additional work will be necessary in order to evaluate possible benefits of targeted nanoconjugates carrying radionuclides. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12645-021-00081-z.

Indexed as

Iron oxide core nanoparticlesNanocompositesNanoconjugatesNeuroblastomaRadiosensitizationTitanium dioxide shell nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID34777621
PMCPMC8550682
OpenAlexW3139059529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.