Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34777441›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Potential Biotechnological Applications of Autophagy for Agriculture.

Nipuni Thanthrige, Sudipta Das Bhowmik, Brett J Ferguson, Mehdi Kabbage, Sagadevan G Mundree, Brett Williams

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Can autophagy enhance crop resilience to environmental stress?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Autophagy in plants.Autophagy reports · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Linking Autophagy to Potential Agronomic Trait Improvement in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nipuni ThanthrigeCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sudipta Das BhowmikCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Brett J FergusonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mehdi KabbageDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Sagadevan G MundreeCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Brett WilliamsCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUAgriculture and Food · AUUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a genetically regulated, eukaryotic cellular degradation system that sequestrates cytoplasmic materials in specialised vesicles, termed autophagosomes, for delivery and breakdown in the lysosome or vacuole. In plants, autophagy plays essential roles in development (e.g., senescence) and responses to abiotic (e.g., nutrient starvation, drought and oxidative stress) and biotic stresses (e.g., hypersensitive response). Initially, autophagy was considered a non-selective bulk degradation mechanism that provides energy and building blocks for homeostatic balance during stress. Recent studies, however, reveal that autophagy may be more subtle and selectively target ubiquitylated protein aggregates, protein complexes and even organelles for degradation to regulate vital cellular processes even during favourable conditions. The selective nature of autophagy lends itself to potential manipulation and exploitation as part of designer protein turnover machinery for the development of stress-tolerant and disease-resistant crops, crops with increased yield potential and agricultural efficiency and reduced post-harvest losses. Here, we discuss our current understanding of autophagy and speculate its potential manipulation for improved agricultural performance.

Indexed as

abiotic stressautophagycrop improvementpathogen resistanceprogrammed cell deathsenescencestress response

Identifiers

PMID34777441
PMCPMC8579036
OpenAlexW3210751319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.