Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34777309›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2021

Gene Sets and Mechanisms of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Biofilm Formation and Quorum Sensing With Impact on Corrosion.

Abhilash Kumar Tripathi, Payal Thakur, Priya Saxena, Shailabh Rauniyar, Vinoj Gopalakrishnan, Ram Nageena Singh, Venkataramana Gadhamshetty, Etienne Z Gnimpieba, Bharat K Jasthi, Rajesh Kumar Sani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Influence of Copper onMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhilash Kumar TripathiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Payal ThakurDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Priya SaxenaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Shailabh RauniyarDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Vinoj GopalakrishnanDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Ram Nageena SinghDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Venkataramana Gadhamshetty2-Dimensional Materials for Biofilm Engineering, Science and Technology, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Etienne Z Gnimpieba2-Dimensional Materials for Biofilm Engineering, Science and Technology, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Bharat K Jasthi2-Dimensional Materials for Biofilm Engineering, Science and Technology, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Rajesh Kumar SaniDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology · USUniversity of Sioux Falls · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) have a unique ability to respire under anaerobic conditions using sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor, reducing it to hydrogen sulfide. SRB thrives in many natural environments (freshwater sediments and salty marshes), deep subsurface environments (oil wells and hydrothermal vents), and processing facilities in an industrial setting. Owing to their ability to alter the physicochemical properties of underlying metals, SRB can induce fouling, corrosion, and pipeline clogging challenges. Indigenous SRB causes oil souring and associated product loss and, subsequently, the abandonment of impacted oil wells. The sessile cells in biofilms are 1,000 times more resistant to biocides and induce 100-fold greater corrosion than their planktonic counterparts. To effectively combat the challenges posed by SRB, it is essential to understand their molecular mechanisms of biofilm formation and corrosion. Here, we examine the critical genes involved in biofilm formation and microbiologically influenced corrosion and categorize them into various functional categories. The current effort also discusses chemical and biological methods for controlling the SRB biofilms. Finally, we highlight the importance of surface engineering approaches for controlling biofilm formation on underlying metal surfaces.

Indexed as

2D-materialsbiocidesbiocorrosion mechanismbiofilmcomparative genomicsmicrobiologically influenced corrosionquorum sensingsulfate reducing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID34777309
PMCPMC8586430
OpenAlexW3210858440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.