Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34777091›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

The Teaching Pattern of Law Majors Using Artificial Intelligence and Deep Neural Network Under Educational Psychology.

Di Xuan, Delong Zhu, Wenhai Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Di XuanShi Liang School of Law, Changzhou University, Changzhou, China.
Delong ZhuSchool of Management Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu, China.
Wenhai XuSchool of Law, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing attention to the cultivation of legal talents, a new teaching model has been explored through artificial intelligence (AI) technology under educational psychology, which focuses on improving learning initiative, teaching methods, and teaching quality of students. First, the application of AI and deep neural network (DNN) algorithms are reviewed in education, and the advantages and disadvantages of traditional learning material recommendation algorithms are summarized. Then, a personalized learning material recommendation algorithm is put forward based on DNN, together with an adaptive learning system based on DNN. Finally, the traditional user-based collaborative filtering (UserCF) model and lifelong topic modeling (LTM) algorithm are introduced as the control group to verify the performance of the proposed recommendation system. The results show that the best learning rate of model training is 0.0001, the best dropout value is 0.5, and the best batch size is 32. The proposed personalized learning resource recommendation method based on deep learning (DL) still has good stability under various training data scales. The personalized test questions of recommended students are moderately difficult. It is easier to recommend materials according to the acquisition of knowledge points and the practicability of the recommended test questions of students. Personalized learning material recommendation algorithm based on AI can timely feedback needs of students, thereby improving the effect of classroom teaching. Using the combination of AI and DL algorithms in teaching design, students can complete targeted personalized learning assignments, which is of great significance to cultivate high-level legal professionals.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningeducational psychologylaw majorsteaching design

Identifiers

PMID34777091
PMCPMC8586087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.