Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34776991›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

On the Role of LGN/V1 Spontaneous Activity as an Innate Learning Pattern for Visual Development.

Sahar Behpour, David J Field, Mark V Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sahar BehpourDepartment of Information Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.
David J FieldDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Mark V AlbertDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correlated, spontaneous neural activity is known to play a necessary role in visual development, but the higher-order statistical structure of these coherent, amorphous patterns has only begun to emerge in the past decade. Several computational studies have demonstrated how this endogenous activity can be used to train a developing visual system. Models that generate spontaneous activity analogous to retinal waves have shown that these waves can serve as stimuli for efficient coding models of V1. This general strategy in development has one clear advantage: The same learning algorithm can be used both before and after eye-opening. This same insight can be applied to understanding LGN/V1 spontaneous activity. Although lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) activity has been less discussed in the literature than retinal waves, here we argue that the waves found in the LGN have a number of properties that fill the role of a training pattern. We make the case that the role of "innate learning" with spontaneous activity is not only possible, but likely in later stages of visual development, and worth pursuing further using an efficient coding paradigm.

Indexed as

criticalityefficient codinginnate learningself-organizationspontaneous activity

Identifiers

PMID34776991
PMCPMC8589027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.