Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34776858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Studying Synaptically Evoked Cortical Responses

Jinyoung Jang, Mei Hong Zhu, Aditi H Jogdand, Srdjan D Antic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinyoung JangDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
Mei Hong ZhuDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
Aditi H JogdandDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
Srdjan D AnticDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Sparse, Strong and Large Area Targeting of Genetically Encoded IndicatorsU01MH109091 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ANTIC, SRDJAN D, KNOPFEL, THOMAS · 2015 to 2017
$1.6M
Population Network Responses in AD Model AnimalsR21AG064554 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ANTIC, SRDJAN D, YAN, RIQIANG · 2020 to 2021
$451k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG064554NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a typical electrophysiology experiment, synaptic stimulus is delivered in a cortical layer (1-6) and neuronal responses are recorded intracellularly in individual neurons. We recreated this standard electrophysiological paradigm in brain slices of mice expressing genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs). This allowed us to monitor membrane voltages in the target pyramidal neurons (whole-cell), and population voltages in the surrounding neuropil (optical imaging), simultaneously. Pyramidal neurons have complex dendritic trees that span multiple cortical layers. GEVI imaging revealed areas of the brain slice that experienced the strongest depolarization on a specific synaptic stimulus (location and intensity), thus identifying cortical layers that contribute the most afferent activity to the recorded somatic voltage waveform. By combining whole-cell with GEVI imaging, we obtained a crude distribution of activated synaptic afferents in respect to the dendritic tree of a pyramidal cell. Synaptically evoked voltage waves propagating through the cortical neuropil (dendrites and axons) were not static but rather they changed on a millisecond scale. Voltage imaging can identify areas of brain slices in which the neuropil was in a sustained depolarization (plateau), long after the stimulus onset. Upon a barrage of synaptic inputs, a cortical pyramidal neuron experiences: (a) weak temporal summation of evoked voltage transients (EPSPs); and (b) afterhyperpolarization (intracellular recording), which are not represented in the GEVI population imaging signal (optical signal). To explain these findings [(a) and (b)], we used four voltage indicators (ArcLightD, chi-VSFP, Archon1, and di-4-ANEPPS) with different optical sensitivity, optical response speed, labeling strategy, and a target neuron type. All four imaging methods were used in an identical experimental paradigm: layer 1 (L1) synaptic stimulation, to allow direct comparisons. The population voltage signal showed paired-pulse facilitation, caused in part by additional recruitment of new neurons and dendrites. "

Indexed as

Archon1ArcLightButterflydi-4-ANEPPSVSFP

Identifiers

PMID34776858
PMCPMC8579014
OpenAlexW3210351282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.