Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34776834›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

BlocTrain: Block-Wise Conditional Training and Inference for Efficient Spike-Based Deep Learning.

Gopalakrishnan Srinivasan, Kaushik Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gopalakrishnan SrinivasanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Kaushik RoyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking neural networks (SNNs), with their inherent capability to learn sparse spike-based input representations over time, offer a promising solution for enabling the next generation of intelligent autonomous systems. Nevertheless, end-to-end training of deep SNNs is both compute- and memory-intensive because of the need to backpropagate error gradients through time. We propose BlocTrain, which is a scalable and complexity-aware incremental algorithm for memory-efficient training of deep SNNs. We divide a deep SNN into blocks, where each block consists of few convolutional layers followed by a classifier. We train the blocks sequentially using local errors from the classifier. Once a given block is trained, our algorithm dynamically figures out easy vs. hard classes using the class-wise accuracy, and trains the deeper block only on the hard class inputs. In addition, we also incorporate a hard class detector (HCD) per block that is used during inference to exit early for the easy class inputs and activate the deeper blocks only for the hard class inputs. We trained ResNet-9 SNN divided into three blocks, using BlocTrain, on CIFAR-10 and obtained 86.4% accuracy, which is achieved with up to 2.95× lower memory requirement during the course of training, and 1.89× compute efficiency per inference (due to early exit strategy) with 1.45× memory overhead (primarily due to classifier weights) compared to end-to-end network. We also trained ResNet-11, divided into four blocks, on CIFAR-100 and obtained 58.21% accuracy, which is one of the first reported accuracy for SNN trained entirely with spike-based backpropagation on CIFAR-100.

Indexed as

complexity-aware local trainingdeep SNNsfast inferencegreedy block-wise trainingspike-based backpropagation

Identifiers

PMID34776834
PMCPMC8586528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.