Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34776813›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of wildlife research2021

Hunting techniques and their harvest as indicators of mammal diversity and threat in Northern Angola.

Nele Teutloff, Paulina Meller, Manfred Finckh, Almeida Segredo Cabalo, Guedes José Ramiro, Christoph Neinhuis, Thea Lautenschläger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of wildlife research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Fire regime of peatlands in the Angolan Highlands.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nele TeutloffDepartment of Biology, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1110-8346
Paulina MellerBiodiversity, Evolution & Ecology of Plants, Institute of Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-4385
Manfred FinckhBiodiversity, Evolution & Ecology of Plants, Institute of Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-0854
Almeida Segredo CabaloUniversity of Kimpa Vita, Rua Henrique Freitas No. 1, Bairro Popular, Uíge, Province of Uíge Angola.
Guedes José RamiroUniversity of Kimpa Vita, Rua Henrique Freitas No. 1, Bairro Popular, Uíge, Province of Uíge Angola.
Christoph NeinhuisDepartment of Biology, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-4394
Thea LautenschlägerDepartment of Biology, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-9456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over-exploitation of wildlife especially bushmeat trade is the second most important threat to animal biodiversity. This also applies to Northern Angola but data on bushmeat and hunting techniques for this region are rare. Therefore, we study the most common hunting techniques, frequently captured species, and their economic value, and discuss the local resource use in relation to Angolan law and urgent global crises like the loss of biodiversity, the food supply in South African countries, and the risk of zoonoses. We recorded bushmeat hunting in 27 localities in the province of Uíge, accompanied hunters along their snare lines and interviewed additional 20 locals. Seven main types of snares and traps and their characteristics were defined. Hunters own on average 92 ± 128.7 snares and traps and capture about 25.3 ± 23.6 animals monthly. In total, respondents recognized 28 species of mammals of which one is considered as extinct and two as very rare. The majority of recorded species are hunted regularly. Rodents are most commonly caught followed by primates and duikers. Harvesting rates decrease with species' body size, leading to high economic value of and achievable prices for rare, large animals. Overall, our results document the hunting pressure on mammals and the persisting popularity of bushmeat in Northern Angola which poses an imminent threat to remaining mammal populations. Moreover, it endangers ecosystem integrity, rural livelihoods, and human health through the risk of new zoonoses. Our findings underscore the urgent need for sustainable solutions. The Angolan government should play a more active role in enforcing existing hunting legislation to reduce illegal bushmeat trade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10344-021-01541-y.

Indexed as

Angolan legislationBiodiversity crisisBushmeatSnares and trapsSocio-ecological conflictZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34776813
PMCPMC8572081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.