ArticleProceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2021
Metadata Normalization.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latent Causal Modeling for 3D Brain MRI Counterfactuals.Deep generative models : 5th MICCAI workshop, DGM4MICCAI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025, Proceedings. DGM4MICCAI (Workshop) (5th : 2025 : Taejon-si, Korea) · 2026Article
- Confounder-Free Continual Learning via Recursive Feature Normalization.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
- Metadata-conditioned generative models to synthesize anatomically-plausible 3D brain MRIs.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Dividing and Conquering a BlackBox to a Mixture of Interpretable Models: Route, Interpret, Repeat.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2023Article
- A Penalty Approach for Normalizing Feature Distributions to Build Confounder-Free Models.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Batch Normalization (BN) and its variants have delivered tremendous success in combating the covariate shift induced by the training step of deep learning methods. While these techniques normalize feature distributions by standardizing with batch statistics, they do not correct the influence on features from extraneous variables or multiple distributions. Such extra variables, referred to as metadata here, may create bias or confounding effects (e.g., race when classifying gender from face images). We introduce the Metadata Normalization (MDN) layer, a new batch-level operation which can be used end-to-end within the training framework, to correct the influence of metadata on feature distributions. MDN adopts a regression analysis technique traditionally used for preprocessing to remove (regress out) the metadata effects on model features during training. We utilize a metric based on distance correlation to quantify the distribution bias from the metadata and demonstrate that our method successfully removes metadata effects on four diverse settings: one synthetic, one 2D image, one video, and one 3D medical image dataset.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.