ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2021
The Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a New Endoscopic Diagnostic Sign of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Intrapolypoidal White Particles.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological and microbiological study of fungal rhinosinusitis treated with endoscopic surgery.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe diagnostic criteria of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis focus on characteristic clinical, radiographic, histopathologic findings and immunologic characteristics of the disease. None of these are useful for a prompt outpatient diagnosis of the condition. No clear endoscopic signs (pathognomonic) of polyps in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis are mentioned in the literature.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to describe and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an endoscopic sign the METHODOLOGY: In a descriptive, cross-sectional study, 46 chronic rhinosinusitis patients were examined by endoscope in the outpatient clinic. The endoscopic images of the nasal polypi were captured preoperatively. During endoscopic surgery, a sample of nasal polypi was taken for fungal staining and culture. Results of histopathology were compared to the impression of rhinologist on the images of nasal polypi captured preoperatively.
resultsThe most common endoscopic features were the expansion of sinus (24, 52.2%) and intrapolypoidal white particles (50%). Intrapolypoidal white particles were calculated to have 85.71% sensitivity, 65.63% specificity, 52.17% positive predictive value, 91.3% negative predictive value and 71.74% diagnostic accuracy.
conclusionThis study offers a new endoscopic sign, intrapolypoidal white particles for diagnosing allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.