ArticleAI & society2023
Bosses without a heart: socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward Emotional AI in the workplace.
Article in AI & society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The comfort paradox in emotional AI: how AI-mediated anxiety regulation may foster psychological dependence.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- AI-based interviews and applicant perceptions: insights from China and Pakistan.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Approach or avoidance? A dual-pathway model of job crafting in response to generative AI and its impact on career sustainability.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The influence of human agency beliefs on ascribing gaze-signalled communicative intent.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- State-of-the-arts methods for studying factors driving the utilization of open science resources.MethodsX · 2025Review
- Neurotechnological Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Neuromodulation, EEG, Virtual Reality, and Emerging AI Applications.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- The analysis of international communication value assessment of Chinese mythology themed animated films in belt and road under BPNN algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Heartless Rulez! Mechanical objectivity, empathic understanding, and the permissibility of AI.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Top-down norms and psychological empowerment: Explaining Chinese public acceptance of autonomous driving.PloS one · 2025Article
- How sociodemographic factors relate to trust in artificial intelligence among students in Poland and the United Kingdom.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- On manipulation by emotional AI: UK adults' views and governance implications.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Decoding Gen Z: AI's influence on brand trust and purchasing behavior.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Political ideology shapes support for the use of AI in policy-making.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Relationship between perceived threat of artificial intelligence and turnover intention in luxury hotels.Heliyon · 2023Article
- How AI's Self-Prolongation Influences People's Perceptions of Its Autonomous Mind: The Case of U.S. Residents.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Emotional AI and the future of wellbeing in the post-pandemic workplace.AI & society · 2023Article
- RETRACTED ARTICLE: Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2023Article
- An analytical framework for studying attitude towards emotional AI: The three-pronged approach.MethodsX · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biometric technologies are becoming more pervasive in the workplace, augmenting managerial processes such as hiring, monitoring and terminating employees. Until recently, these devices consisted mainly of GPS tools that track location, software that scrutinizes browser activity and keyboard strokes, and heat/motion sensors that monitor workstation presence. Today, however, a new generation of biometric devices has emerged that can sense, read, monitor and evaluate the affective state of a worker. More popularly known by its commercial moniker, Emotional AI, the technology stems from advancements in affective computing. But whereas previous generations of biometric monitoring targeted the exterior physical body of the worker, concurrent with the writings of Foucault and Hardt, we argue that emotion-recognition tools signal a far more invasive disciplinary gaze that exposes and makes vulnerable the inner regions of the worker-self. Our paper explores attitudes towards empathic surveillance by analyzing a survey of 1015 responses of future job-seekers from 48 countries with Bayesian statistics. Our findings reveal affect tools, left unregulated in the workplace, may lead to heightened stress and anxiety among disadvantaged ethnicities, gender and income class. We also discuss a stark cross-cultural discrepancy whereby East Asians, compared to Western subjects, are more likely to profess a trusting attitude toward EAI-enabled automated management. While this emerging technology is driven by neoliberal incentives to optimize the worksite and increase productivity, ultimately, empathic surveillance may create more problems in terms of algorithmic bias, opaque decisionism, and the erosion of employment relations. Thus, this paper nuances and extends emerging literature on emotion-sensing technologies in the workplace, particularly through its highly original cross-cultural study. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00146-021-01290-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.