Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34776508›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

Attitudes among parents of persons with autism spectrum disorder towards information about genetic risk and future health.

Jarle Johannessen, Terje Nærland, Sigrun Hope, Tonje Torske, Anett Kaale, Katrine V Wirgenes, Eva Malt, Srdjan Djurovic, Marcella Rietschel, Ole A Andreassen

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for a Child's Autism on Parental Perceptions.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Happy 30th birthday to the European Journal of Human Genetics!European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jarle JohannessenK. G. Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Oslo, Norway. t.j.johannessen@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-1058
Terje NærlandK. G. Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Oslo, Norway.
Sigrun HopeK. G. Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Oslo, Norway.
Tonje TorskeDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Anett KaaleNevSom, Department of Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Katrine V WirgenesDepartment of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eva MaltInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Srdjan DjurovicDepartment of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8140-8061
Marcella RietschelDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ole A AndreassenK. G. Jebsen Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-3568
Oslo University Hospital · NOHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Oslo · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical relevance of genetic testing is increasing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Information about genetic risk may contribute to improved diagnostics, treatment and family planning, but may also be perceived as a burden. Knowledge about the families' preferences with regard to genetic risk information is important for both health care professionals and policy makers. We investigated attitudes towards sharing information about genetic risk of ASD and knowledge about future health among parent members of the Norwegian Autism Association (N = 1455) using a questionnaire, and the relationships with parent and child characteristics, such as age, gender and ASD severity. Most preferred autonomy in deciding whom to inform about genetic risk of ASD (74.4%) and a minority supported extensive intra-familial disclosure of the genetic risk (41.1%). The majority agreed that it is an obligation to know as much as possible relevant for future health (58.0%) and only 51.7% agreed to a principle of a 'right not to know'. In regression models, the attitudes were associated with opinions about benefits and harms of genetic testing (e.g., treatment, family planning, understanding of ASD pathology, insurance discrimination and family conflict). In sum, the findings show that most parents want to know as much as possible relevant for their children's future health and keep their autonomy and intra-familial confidentiality about genetic risk information. Nearly half of the parents were not concerned with a "right not to know". These attitudes can inform development of guidelines and bioethics in the age of genomic precision medicine.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAttitudeChildHumansParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34776508
PMCPMC9553933
OpenAlexW3212607254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.