Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34776426›Full record

ArticleNeuroRehabilitation2021

Multisite non-invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A scoping review.

Camila Beatriz da Silva Machado, Letícia Maria da Silva, Alessandra Feitosa Gonçalves, Palloma Rodrigues de Andrade, Cristina Katya Torres Teixeira Mendes, Thais Josy Castro Freire de Assis, Clécio de Oliveira Godeiro Júnior, Suellen Marinho Andrade

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroRehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila Beatriz da Silva MachadoAging and Neuroscience Laboratory, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Letícia Maria da SilvaAging and Neuroscience Laboratory, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Alessandra Feitosa GonçalvesPhysical Therapy Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Palloma Rodrigues de AndradePhysical Therapy Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Cristina Katya Torres Teixeira MendesPhysical Therapy Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Thais Josy Castro Freire de AssisPhysical Therapy Department, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Clécio de Oliveira Godeiro JúniorDivision of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University, La Tronche, Grenoble, France.
Suellen Marinho AndradeAging and Neuroscience Laboratory, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by cardinal motor symptoms in addition to cognitive impairment. New insights concerning multisite non-invasive brain stimulation effects have been gained, which can now be used to develop innovative treatment approaches.

objectiveMap the researchs involving multisite non-invasive brain stimulation in PD, synthesize the available evidence and discuss future directions.

methodsThe databases PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception until April 2020, without restrictions on the date of publication or the language in which it was published. The reviewers worked in pairs and sequentially evaluated the titles, abstracts and then the full text of all publications identified as potentially relevant.

resultsTwelve articles met the inclusion criteria. The target brain regions included mainly the combination of a motor and a frontal area, such as stimulation of the primary motor córtex associated with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Most of the trials showed that this modality was only more effective for the motor component, or for the cognitive and/or non-motor, separately.

conclusionsDespite the results being encouraging for the use of the multisite aproach, the indication for PD management should be carried out with caution and deserves scientific deepening.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionParkinson DiseaseTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBrainDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationnon-invasive brain stimulationParkinson’s diseasetranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34776426
PMCPMC8764602
OpenAlexW3214288645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.