Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34775672›Full record

SynthesisCancer science2022

The prognostic influence of lymphatic endothelium-specific hyaluronan receptor 1 in cancer: A systematic review.

Sini Karinen, Roosa Hujanen, Tuula Salo, Abdelhakim Salem

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Lymphatic Vessel Density or Area Are Not Reliable Prognostic Factors in Oral Cancer.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Knockout ofCancer genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Molecular pathophysiology of secondary lymphedema.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sini KarinenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Roosa HujanenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuula SaloDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Abdelhakim SalemDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9455-3823
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Helsingin ja Uudenmaan SairaanhoitopiiriJane ja Aatos Erkon SäätiöMinerva FoundationOulun Yliopistollinen SairaalaPaulon SäätiöSigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöSuomen Lääketieteen SäätiöSyöpäjärjestötThe MD-PhD Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphangiogenesis is a key process in cancer development and metastasis. Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) is a widely used marker for lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC), which also mediates immune and cancer cell migration. Recently, LYVE-1-positive tumor cells were shown to acquire LEC-like phenotype and exploit this receptor for lymphatic dissemination. Furthermore, selective targeting of LYVE-1 impaired the growth of cancer-related vasculature and reduced metastasis in vivo, signifying its role in therapeutic and prognostic applications. Although numerous studies have investigated the role of LYVE-1 in cancer, a unifying detailed review of its prognostic utility is lacking to date. Thus, we compiled and critically appraised evidence from clinical studies comprising a total of 2352 patients diagnosed with different types of cancer and using a variety of experimental approaches. Collectively, most studies revealed a significant association between LYVE-1 overexpression and dismal outcome of at least one survival estimate. Furthermore, the importance of vasculature location, intra- or peritumoral, and the influence of various lymphangiogenesis-related parameters, such as lymphatic vessel density and invasion, were discussed. However, the specificity of LYVE-1 staining is challenged by its expression in non-LEC cells, implying the need for double labelling to better estimate its prognostic significance. In conclusion, this is to our knowledge the first comprehensive systematic review on the prognostic value of LYVE-1 in cancer. More well-designed studies across different populations and the development of standardized protocols would be paramount for the consistency of LYVE-1 findings and for its potential transferability to clinical practice in future.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasmsPrognosisVesicular Transport ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorLYVE1 protein, humanVesicular Transport Proteinsbiomarkercancerlymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1metastasisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34775672
PMCPMC8748220
OpenAlexW3209561703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.