Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34775578›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2022

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Inhaled Biologic Therapeutic in Adults with Respiratory Distress Secondary to COVID-19 Infection.

Michael Roshon, Luciano Lemos-Filho, Holli Cherevka, Laura Goldberg, Kristin Salottolo, David Bar-Or

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04606784 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Nebulized Ampion In Adults With Respiratory Distress Secondary to COVID-19 Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04606784 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Nebulized Ampion In Adults With Respiratory Distress Secondary to COVID-19 Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmpio Pharmaceuticals. Inc.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsCovid19ArmsAmpion, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael RoshonPhysician Residencies and Research Operations, Centura Hospital, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Luciano Lemos-FilhoNational Jewish Division of Pulmonary at Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, CO, USA.
Holli CherevkaAmpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Englewood, CO, USA.
Laura GoldbergAmpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Englewood, CO, USA.
Kristin SalottoloTrauma Research Department, Penrose Hospital, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
David Bar-OrAmpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Englewood, CO, USA. davidbme49@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-314X
Ampio Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USPenrose Hospital · USSwedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInhaled therapeutics may act to directly target and attenuate lung inflammation due to COVID-19. An inhalation form of a novel biologic drug, AMP5A, is being developed as an immunomodulatory agent to treat dysregulated immune responses and is being studied in hospitalized patients to treat respiratory complications due to COVID-19.

methodsA randomized, controlled, phase I trial was conducted to evaluate hospitalized adults with respiratory distress secondary to COVID-19. Patients received the standard care (SOC) for COVID-19, including respiratory therapy, corticosteroids, and antiviral therapies such as remdesivir. Patients were randomized 1:1 to inhalation treatment with AMP5A as an adjunct to SOC or to SOC alone (control). AMP5A was administered via inhalation daily for 5 days via hand-held nebulizer, non-invasive ventilator, or mechanical ventilation. Safety and clinical efficacy endpoints were evaluated.

resultsForty subjects were enrolled and randomized (n = 19 AMP5A, n = 21 control). Remdesivir was used in fewer AMP5A subjects (26%) than control (52%), and dexamethasone was administered for most subjects (84% AMP5A, 71% control). The study met its primary endpoint with no AMP5A treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and the incidence and severity of AEs were comparable between groups: 18 AEs for control (8 mild, 1 moderate, 9 severe) and 19 AEs for AMP5A (7 mild, 7 moderate, 5 severe). Notably, subjects treated with AMP5A had fewer deaths (5% vs. 24%), shorter hospital stay (8 days vs. 12 days), fewer ICU admissions (21% vs. 33%), and a greater proportion with improved clinical outcomes than control.

conclusionThe phase I clinical results indicate inhaled AMP5A is safe, is well tolerated, and could lead to fewer patients experiencing deterioration or death. Based on the treatment effect (i.e., reduced mortality), a phase II trial has been initiated.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04606784.

Indexed as

COVID-19EfficacyInhalation treatmentSafety

Identifiers

PMID34775578
PMCPMC8590808
OpenAlexW3212020407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.